Shen Yinchen, Xu Xun, Liu Kun
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China; Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(8):1423-8.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the major causes of visual impairment in patients with diabetes mellitus. DME shows a variety of clinical characteristics with unpredictable results to treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) in DME, which is a rapid, noninvasive technique for fundus diseases.
A total of 18 patients (30 eyes) with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) were enrolled. FAF imaging was performed with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Other ophthalmic examinations included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), MP-1 microperimetry, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Main outcome measurements included BCVA, macular sensitivity (MS), central retinal thickness (CRT), central retinal volume (CRV), the integrity of the inner segment-outer segment junction (IS/OS), and the integrity of the external limiting membrane (ELM).
Among the 30 eyes, four eyes (13.3%) had normal foveal FAF and 26 eyes (86.7%) had abnormal FAF. Abnormal FAF was mainly divided into three types: cystoid increased FAF (iFAF) 16 eyes (53.3%), spot iFAF six eyes (20%), irregular decreased FAF (dFAF) four eyes (13.3%). According to the FAF morphology, patients were categorized into four groups: normal, cystoid iFAF, spot iFAF, and irregular dFAF. There was a significant difference in BCVA (P < 0.001) and MS (P < 0.05) among the four groups. The visual function of patients with spot iFAF and irregular dFAF was relatively poor. However, there was no difference in CRT (P = 0.186) and CRV (P = 0.191) among the four groups. In the normal FAF group, the photoreceptor layers were mostly intact. Regarding the cystoid iFAF group, the photoreceptor layers were relatively intact, while in the other two groups, IS/OS and ELM were disrupted in most patients. No one had intact IS/OS or ELM layer.
FAF might reflect the damage of the retina and had a relationship with visual function as well as photoreceptor integrity, which gives new insight into the evaluation of DME. Dynamic FAF monitoring helps to better evaluate the disease progression of DME as well as visual function.
糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)是糖尿病患者视力损害的主要原因之一。DME具有多种临床特征,治疗结果不可预测。本研究的目的是调查DME患者的眼底自发荧光(FAF)特征,FAF是一种用于眼底疾病的快速、非侵入性技术。
共纳入18例(30只眼)具有临床意义的黄斑水肿(CSME)患者。使用共焦扫描激光眼底镜进行FAF成像。其他眼科检查包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、MP-1微视野检查和光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)。主要观察指标包括BCVA、黄斑敏感度(MS)、中心视网膜厚度(CRT)、中心视网膜体积(CRV)、内节-外节连接(IS/OS)的完整性以及外界膜(ELM)的完整性。
在30只眼中,4只眼(13.3%)黄斑中心凹FAF正常,26只眼(86.7%)FAF异常。异常FAF主要分为三种类型:囊样增强FAF(iFAF)16只眼(53.3%)、点状iFAF 6只眼(20%)、不规则减弱FAF(dFAF)4只眼(13.3%)。根据FAF形态,将患者分为四组:正常、囊样iFAF、点状iFAF和不规则dFAF。四组之间的BCVA(P < 0.001)和MS(P < 0.05)存在显著差异。点状iFAF和不规则dFAF患者的视觉功能相对较差。然而,四组之间的CRT(P = 0.186)和CRV(P = 0.191)没有差异。在正常FAF组中,光感受器层大多完整。在囊样iFAF组中,光感受器层相对完整,而在其他两组中,大多数患者的IS/OS和ELM遭到破坏。没有人的IS/OS或ELM层完整。
FAF可能反映视网膜损伤,与视觉功能以及光感受器完整性有关,这为DME的评估提供了新的见解。动态FAF监测有助于更好地评估DME的疾病进展以及视觉功能。