Yendell S J, Taylor J, Biggerstaff B J, Tabony L, Staples J E, Fischer M
Division of Vector-Borne Diseases,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Fort Collins, CO,USA.
Infectious Disease Control Unit,Texas Department of State Health Services,Austin, TX,USA.
Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Jan;143(2):419-26. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814000909. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
We evaluated laboratory reports as early indicators of West Nile virus (WNV) disease cases in Texas. We compared WNV laboratory results in the National Electronic Disease Surveillance System Base System (NBS) to WNV disease cases reported to the state health department from 2008 to 2012. We calculated sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of NBS reports, estimated the number of disease cases expected per laboratory report, and determined lead and lag times. The sensitivity and PPV of NBS laboratory reports were 86% and 77%, respectively. For every 10 positive laboratory reports, we expect 9·0 (95% confidence interval 8·9-9·2) reported disease cases. Laboratory reports preceded case reports with a lead time of 7 days. Electronic laboratory reports provided longer lead times than manually entered reports (P < 0·01). NBS laboratory reports are useful estimates of future reported WNV disease cases and may provide timely information for planning public health interventions.
我们评估了实验室报告,将其作为德克萨斯州西尼罗河病毒(WNV)疾病病例的早期指标。我们将国家电子疾病监测系统基础系统(NBS)中的WNV实验室结果与2008年至2012年向州卫生部门报告的WNV疾病病例进行了比较。我们计算了NBS报告的敏感性和阳性预测值(PPV),估计了每份实验室报告预期的疾病病例数,并确定了提前期和延迟期。NBS实验室报告的敏感性和PPV分别为86%和77%。每10份阳性实验室报告,我们预计会有9.0例(95%置信区间8.9 - 9.2)报告的疾病病例。实验室报告比病例报告提前7天。电子实验室报告的提前期比手动录入的报告更长(P < 0.01)。NBS实验室报告是未来报告的WNV疾病病例的有用估计,可为规划公共卫生干预措施提供及时信息。