Vincent Charles, Burnett Susan, Carthey Jane
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Imperial Centre for Patient Safety & Service Quality, London, UK.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Aug;23(8):670-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002757. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
Patients, clinicians and managers all want to be reassured that their healthcare organisation is safe. But there is no consensus about what we mean when we ask whether a healthcare organisation is safe or how this is achieved. In the UK, the measurement of harm, so important in the evolution of patient safety, has been neglected in favour of incident reporting. The use of softer intelligence for monitoring and anticipation of problems receives little mention in official policy. The Francis Inquiry report into patient treatment at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust set out 29 recommendations on measurement, more than on any other topic, and set the measurement of safety an absolute priority for healthcare organisations. The Berwick review found that most healthcare organisations at present have very little capacity to analyse, monitor or learn from safety and quality information. This paper summarises the findings of a more extensive report and proposes a framework which can guide clinical teams and healthcare organisations in the measurement and monitoring of safety and in reviewing progress against safety objectives. The framework has been used so far to promote self-reflection at both board and clinical team level, to stimulate an organisational check or analysis in the gaps of information and to promote discussion of 'what could we do differently'.
患者、临床医生和管理人员都希望得到保证,即他们的医疗保健机构是安全的。但是,当我们询问一个医疗保健机构是否安全以及如何实现安全时,对于我们的意思并没有达成共识。在英国,在患者安全的发展过程中非常重要的伤害衡量,却被忽视,转而青睐事件报告。在官方政策中,很少提及使用更软性的情报来监测和预测问题。弗朗西斯对米德斯塔福德郡国民保健服务基金会信托基金患者治疗情况的调查报告提出了29项关于衡量的建议,比其他任何主题的建议都多,并将安全衡量设定为医疗保健机构的绝对优先事项。贝里克审查发现,目前大多数医疗保健机构在分析、监测安全和质量信息或从中吸取教训方面的能力非常有限。本文总结了一份更广泛报告的结果,并提出了一个框架,该框架可以指导临床团队和医疗保健机构进行安全衡量和监测,并审查在实现安全目标方面的进展。到目前为止,该框架已被用于促进董事会和临床团队层面的自我反思,激发对信息差距的组织检查或分析,并促进关于“我们可以做些什么不同的事情”的讨论。