• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Media preferences in scenarios involving relationship closeness and information valence: evidence of strategic self-presentation and sex differences.

作者信息

Johnsen Jan-Are K, Kummervold Per Egil, Wynn Rolf

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2014 Feb;114(1):217-30. doi: 10.2466/21.07.PR0.114k14w9.

DOI:10.2466/21.07.PR0.114k14w9
PMID:24765722
Abstract

The study investigated strategic self-presentation (relationship closeness, information valence, and sex) on hypothetical choice of media used. 145 participants (73 women, 72 men; M age = 22.3 yr.) were randomly assigned to experimental conditions where they indicated their preference for communicating with either a friend or a stranger using Short Messaging Service (SMS), e-mail, or telephone, compared to face-to-face. Information valence was manipulated as a within-subjects variable by scenarios where information was self-referential and either negative or positive. Preference to mediated channels in the two scenarios was measured as an average of self-reported scores on a scale from 1-5 where 3 indicated face-to-face communication. Relationship closeness and scenario affected media preferences. Participants had higher preference scores for mediated channels when communicating with strangers than with friends and when sharing self-referential and negative information. Only women's preferences appeared to be affected by the manipulation of relationship closeness.

摘要

相似文献

1
Media preferences in scenarios involving relationship closeness and information valence: evidence of strategic self-presentation and sex differences.
Psychol Rep. 2014 Feb;114(1):217-30. doi: 10.2466/21.07.PR0.114k14w9.
2
Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to face-to-face communication.
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Aug;7(4):472-8. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.472.
3
The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness.单维关系亲近度量表(URCS):一种新的关系亲近度测量工具的信度和效度证据。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):565-72. doi: 10.1037/a0026265. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
4
Social media, text messaging, and email-preferences of asthma patients between 12 and 40 years old.12至40岁哮喘患者的社交媒体、短信和电子邮件偏好。
J Asthma. 2011 Oct;48(8):824-30. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.608460. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
5
What's closeness got to do with it? Men's and women's cortisol responses when providing and receiving support.亲密有什么关系?男性和女性提供和接受支持时的皮质醇反应。
Psychosom Med. 2009 Oct;71(8):843-51. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181b492e6. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
6
Talk or text to tell? How young adults in Canada and South Africa prefer to receive STI results, counseling, and treatment updates in a wireless world.口头或文字告知?在无线世界中,加拿大和南非的年轻人更愿意以何种方式接收性传播感染结果、咨询和治疗更新信息。
J Health Commun. 2013;18(12):1465-76. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.798379. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
7
Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls.8 至 12 岁女孩的媒体使用、面对面交流、媒体多任务处理和社交幸福感。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):327-36. doi: 10.1037/a0027030. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
8
Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: social motives and social context.计算机媒介传播中的表情符号:社会动机与社会背景。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Feb;11(1):99-101. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9926.
9
Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.伴侣偏好确实可以预测选择伴侣的早期阶段的吸引力和选择。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Nov;105(5):757-76. doi: 10.1037/a0033777. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
10
Friendship closeness inventory: development and psychometric evaluation.友谊亲密度量表:编制与心理测量学评估
Psychol Rep. 2002 Aug;91(1):142-52. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.91.1.142.