• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

友谊亲密度量表:编制与心理测量学评估

Friendship closeness inventory: development and psychometric evaluation.

作者信息

Polimeni Anne-Maree, Hardie Elizabeth, Buzwell Simone

机构信息

Swinburne University of Technology, School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2002 Aug;91(1):142-52. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.91.1.142.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.2002.91.1.142
PMID:12353773
Abstract

This study developed a psychometrically sound measure of closeness in Australian men's (n = 59) and women's (n = 77) same-sex friendships, the Friendship Closeness Inventory. Subscales were developed to measure both masculine and feminine styles of closeness in three domains of Emotional Closeness, Behavioural Closeness, and Cognitive Closeness. The inventory was subjected to reliability checks which supported the reliability of each scale, and factor analyses which supported the 3-factor design. Correlations among ratings on subscales suggested that the affective, behavioural, and cognitive dimensions are distinguishable but related components of friendship. Group comparisons indicated that women rated themselves closer to their same-sex friends on the affective dimension than men. Researchers have suggested that sex-role socialisation may partly account for sex differences in self-ratings of emotional expressiveness in friendships. There were no significant differences between men's and women's ratings on the behavioural and cognitive aspects of friendships. The cognitive element may need further exploration in further scale development as it measures only one aspect of cognitive closeness: the perceived influence of friends. Pending further validation, the inventory appears potentially useful for research exploring affective, behavioural, and cognitive elements of young men's and women's friendships.

摘要

本研究开发了一种心理测量学上可靠的测量澳大利亚男性(n = 59)和女性(n = 77)同性友谊亲密度的工具——友谊亲密度量表。该量表的分量表用于测量情感亲密度、行为亲密度和认知亲密度三个领域中男性化和女性化的亲密风格。该量表进行了信度检验,结果支持了各分量表的信度,还进行了因子分析,结果支持了三因素设计。分量表评分之间的相关性表明,情感、行为和认知维度是友谊中可区分但相关的组成部分。组间比较表明,在情感维度上,女性对自己与同性朋友亲密程度的评分高于男性。研究人员认为,性别角色社会化可能部分解释了友谊中情感表达自我评分的性别差异。在友谊的行为和认知方面,男性和女性的评分没有显著差异。由于认知要素仅测量认知亲密度的一个方面:朋友的感知影响,因此在进一步的量表开发中可能需要进一步探索。在进一步验证之前,该量表似乎对探索年轻男性和女性友谊的情感、行为和认知要素的研究有潜在用途。

相似文献

1
Friendship closeness inventory: development and psychometric evaluation.友谊亲密度量表:编制与心理测量学评估
Psychol Rep. 2002 Aug;91(1):142-52. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.91.1.142.
2
Identity as a moderator of gender differences in the emotional closeness of emerging adults' same- and cross-sex friendships.作为新兴成年人同性和异性友谊情感亲密度中性别差异调节因素的身份认同。
Adolescence. 2007 Spring;42(165):1-23.
3
Gender, grade, and relationship differences in emotional closeness within adolescent friendships.青少年友谊中情感亲密度的性别、年级及关系差异。
Adolescence. 2004 Summer;39(154):243-55.
4
What's closeness got to do with it? Men's and women's cortisol responses when providing and receiving support.亲密有什么关系?男性和女性提供和接受支持时的皮质醇反应。
Psychosom Med. 2009 Oct;71(8):843-51. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181b492e6. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
5
Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: a prototype interaction-pattern model.同性友谊中的亲密期望:一种原型互动模式模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):265-84. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.265.
6
Beyond intimacy: conceptualizing sex differences in same-sex friendships.
J Psychol. 2000 Jan;134(1):93-101. doi: 10.1080/00223980009600852.
7
Behavioral, affective, and social correlates of involvement in cross-sex friendship in elementary school.小学阶段参与异性友谊的行为、情感及社会关联因素。
Child Dev. 1996 Oct;67(5):2269-86.
8
The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness.单维关系亲近度量表(URCS):一种新的关系亲近度测量工具的信度和效度证据。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):565-72. doi: 10.1037/a0026265. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
9
A latent class analysis of friendship network types and their predictors in the second half of life.晚年友谊网络类型及其预测因素的潜在类别分析。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Jul;68(4):644-52. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt041. Epub 2013 May 20.
10
Friendship quality in adolescents with and without an intellectual disability.青少年有无智力残疾者的友谊质量。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Nov;26(6):522-32. doi: 10.1111/jar.12051. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Group Interpersonal Synchrony Increases Prosocial Behavior in Young Autistic Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.群体人际同步性增加自闭症青年成年人的亲社会行为:一项随机对照试验。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06949-y.
2
The effectiveness of group interpersonal synchrony in young autistic adults' work environment: A mixed methods RCT study protocol.小组人际同步对年轻自闭症成年人工作环境的有效性:一项混合方法 RCT 研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0307956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307956. eCollection 2024.