Chu Min-Chin, Chen Shu-Hui
Psychol Rep. 2014 Feb;114(1):272-91. doi: 10.2466/28.10.PR0.114k17w0.
Empirical evidence shows that explicit phonics teaching is beneficial for English word reading. However, there has been controversy as to whether phonics teaching should incorporate meaning-involved decodable text instruction to facilitate children's word reading. This study compares the effects of phonics teaching with and without decodable text instruction on immediate and delayed English word reading in 117 Taiwanese children learning English, assigned to a Phonics-only group (n = 58) and a phonics plus decodable text instruction (Phonics+) group (n = 59). Results showed that although both groups significantly improved in immediate and delayed post-test word reading, the Phonics+ group performed better in both post-tests, but the difference was significant only in the delayed word reading, suggesting a better long-term retention effect produced by Phonics+ teaching. These indicated that incorporated meaning-involved decodable text reading might offer another better facilitative linking route for English word reading even for non-alphabetic child learners of English. The findings were discussed from linguistic, psycholinguistic, and reading perspectives, with implications drawn for second/foreign language teaching and research in reading instruction.
实证证据表明,明确的自然拼读教学对英语单词阅读有益。然而,关于自然拼读教学是否应纳入包含意义的可解码文本教学以促进儿童单词阅读,一直存在争议。本研究比较了有可解码文本教学和无可解码文本教学的自然拼读教学对117名学习英语的台湾儿童即时和延迟英语单词阅读的影响,这些儿童被分为纯自然拼读组(n = 58)和自然拼读加可解码文本教学(自然拼读+)组(n = 59)。结果显示,虽然两组在即时和延迟后测单词阅读中均有显著提高,但自然拼读+组在两次后测中表现更好,但差异仅在延迟单词阅读中显著,这表明自然拼读+教学产生了更好的长期记忆效果。这些结果表明,即使对于非字母文字的英语儿童学习者,纳入包含意义的可解码文本阅读可能为英语单词阅读提供另一条更好的促进联系途径。从语言学、心理语言学和阅读角度对研究结果进行了讨论,并得出了对第二语言/外语阅读教学及研究的启示。