Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, TR10 9EZ, United Kingdom.
Ecol Lett. 2014 Jul;17(7):803-10. doi: 10.1111/ele.12284. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
According to classical parental care theory males are expected to provide less parental care when offspring in a brood are less likely to be their own, but empirical evidence in support of this relationship is equivocal. Recent work predicts that social interactions between the sexes can modify co-evolution between traits involved in mating and parental care as a result of costs associated with these social interactions (i.e. sexual conflict). In burying beetles (Nicrophorus vespilloides), we use artificial selection on a paternity assurance trait, and crosses within and between selection lines, to show that selection acting on females, not males, can drive the co-evolution of paternity assurance traits and parental care. Males do not care more in response to selection on mating rate. Instead, patterns of parental care change as an indirect response to costs of mating for females.
根据经典的亲代抚育理论,当一窝后代不太可能是自己的后代时,雄性应该提供较少的亲代抚育,但支持这种关系的经验证据是模棱两可的。最近的研究预测,性别之间的社会互动可以改变与交配和亲代抚育相关的特征之间的共同进化,因为这些社会互动(即性冲突)会带来成本。在埋葬甲虫(Nicrophorus vespilloides)中,我们使用父权保证性状的人工选择以及选择线内和线间的杂交,表明选择作用于雌性而不是雄性,可以推动父权保证性状和亲代抚育的共同进化。选择对交配率的影响不会导致雄性给予更多的照顾。相反,亲代抚育模式的变化是雌性交配成本的间接反应。