Hart Joshua
Department of Psychology Union College, Schenectady, NY 12308, United States.
Soc Sci Res. 2014 Jul;46:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
Despite drawing on a common pool of data, observers of the 2012 presidential campaign came to different conclusions about whether, how, and to what extent "October surprise" Hurricane Sandy influenced the election. The present study used a mixed correlational and experimental design to assess the relation between, and effect of, the salience of Hurricane Sandy on attitudes and voting intentions regarding President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in a large sample of voting-aged adults. Results suggest that immediately following positive news coverage of Obama's handling of the storm's aftermath, Sandy's salience positively influenced attitudes toward Obama, but that by election day, reminders of the hurricane became a drag instead of a boon for the President. In addition to theoretical implications, this study provides an example of how to combine methodological approaches to help answer questions about the impact of unpredictable, large-scale events as they unfold.
尽管都基于同一组数据,但2012年总统大选的观察者们对于“十月惊奇”飓风桑迪是否、如何以及在多大程度上影响了选举得出了不同结论。本研究采用了相关分析与实验相结合的设计,以评估在大量达到投票年龄的成年人样本中,飓风桑迪的显著程度与对巴拉克·奥巴马总统和米特·罗姆尼的态度及投票意向之间的关系及影响。结果表明,在奥巴马应对风暴后果的正面新闻报道之后,桑迪的显著程度对奥巴马的态度产生了积极影响,但到选举日时,对飓风的提及对总统而言却成了拖累而非助力。除了理论意义之外,本研究还提供了一个示例,展示了如何结合方法来帮助回答关于不可预测的大规模事件在其发展过程中所产生影响的问题。