Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波碎石术对单腔频率应答起搏器和双腔起搏器的影响。

Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on single chamber rate response and dual chamber pacemakers.

作者信息

Fetter J, Patterson D, Aram G, Hayes D L

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Sep;12(9):1494-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb06154.x.

Abstract

This study evaluated effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on four models of Medtronic implantable cardiac pacemakers. In vitro testing consisted of: (1) unsynchronized pacemaker strapped on the patient with extracorporeal shock synchronized to the patient's native heart rate; and (2) pacemakers suspended alone in water 6 inches from the focal point, synchronizing the extracorporeal shock to pacemaker output. Unsynchronized shocks affected each model of pacemaker differently, i.e., single chamber constant rate pacemakers experienced extended periods of inhibition for more than three pacing cycles while activity-triggered rate response pacemakers exhibited rate increases to the upper rate setting. Dual chamber synchronous pacemakers exhibited intermittently a 59% decrease and a 20% increase in ventricular rate due to inhibition and triggering, respectively, from shock oversensing. Synchronized shocks did not alter the rate of single chamber constant rate pacemakers, but did cause the rate to increase to the upper rate setting for activity-triggered rate response pacemakers. The shock was synchronized to the initial atrial output from the dual chamber pacemaker and caused frequent inhibition of the ventricular stimulus when the ventricular-safety-pace (VSP) feature was programmed off. Programming VSP on reduced the incidence of ventricular inhibition resulting in near normal pacemaker operation. There was neither observable damage to pacemaker components nor spurious reprogramming of pacemaker parameters during the tests. Our studies with one manufacturer's pacemakers suggests that lithotripsy shock effects on implantable pacemakers can be tolerated provided: (1) the single chamber pacemaker is programmed to the demand constant rate modality; (2) the dual chamber pacemaker is programmed to VSP on or to the VVI mode; and (3) the pacemaker distance to the focal point is greater than 6 inches.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究评估了体外冲击波碎石术对四种美敦力植入式心脏起搏器模型的影响。体外测试包括:(1)将非同步起搏器绑在患者身上,使体外冲击波与患者的固有心率同步;(2)将起搏器单独悬浮在距焦点6英寸的水中,使体外冲击波与起搏器输出同步。非同步冲击波对每种起搏器模型的影响不同,即单腔恒率起搏器经历了超过三个起搏周期的长时间抑制,而活动触发型频率应答起搏器的频率则增加到上限频率设置。双腔同步起搏器由于冲击波感知过度,分别出现心室率间歇性下降59%和上升20%,这是由抑制和触发导致的。同步冲击波并未改变单腔恒率起搏器的频率,但确实使活动触发型频率应答起搏器的频率增加到上限频率设置。冲击波与双腔起搏器的初始心房输出同步,当心室安全起搏(VSP)功能关闭时,会频繁抑制心室刺激。开启VSP可降低心室抑制的发生率,使起搏器操作接近正常。在测试过程中,未观察到起搏器组件受损,也没有起搏器参数的虚假重新编程。我们对一家制造商的起搏器进行的研究表明,只要满足以下条件,就可以耐受碎石术冲击波对植入式起搏器的影响:(1)将单腔起搏器编程为按需恒率模式;(2)将双腔起搏器编程为开启VSP或VVI模式;(3)起搏器距焦点的距离大于6英寸。(摘要截短于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验