Olsen Thomas, Hoffmann Peter
From the University Eye Clinic (Olsen), Aarhus Hospital NBG, Aarhus C, Denmark, and the Augen- und Laserklinik (Hoffmann), Castrop-Rauxel, Germany.
From the University Eye Clinic (Olsen), Aarhus Hospital NBG, Aarhus C, Denmark, and the Augen- und Laserklinik (Hoffmann), Castrop-Rauxel, Germany.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 May;40(5):764-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.037.
To evaluate the accuracy of the C constant for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.
Case series.
Public university hospital and private clinic.
Preoperatively, all intraocular distances were measured using laser biometry. Various IOL designs were studied; powers ranged from -5.0 diopters (D) to +38.0 D. The IOL power calculation was performed with the Olsen formula using the C constant and compared with the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and the SRK/T formulas on optimized datasets. Outcome measures were the error of the prediction, expressed as the arithmetic error, and the absolute error between the observed refraction and the predicted refraction.
Two thousand forty-three cases from the 2 centers were studied. No significant differences were found between the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas with the exception of the SRK/T formula, which performed better than the other thin-lens formulas in eyes with an axial length (AL) greater than 27.0 mm (P<.01). Compared with the SRK/T formula, the Olsen formula showed an improvement of 15% and 14% in the mean absolute error and a 39% and 85% reduction in the number of large errors (>1.0 D) for the 2 series, respectively (P<.0001). Contrary to the Olsen formula, all thin-lens formulas showed a significant bias in terms of the AL, keratometry reading, and anterior segment length (P<.0001).
The C constant is a promising concept for ray tracing-assisted IOL power calculation.
评估用于光线追踪辅助人工晶状体(IOL)屈光力计算的C常数的准确性。
病例系列研究。
公立大学医院和私立诊所。
术前,使用激光生物测量法测量所有眼内距离。研究了各种IOL设计;屈光力范围为-5.0屈光度(D)至+38.0 D。使用C常数通过奥尔森公式进行IOL屈光力计算,并在优化数据集上与海吉斯公式、霍弗Q公式、霍拉迪1公式和SRK/T公式进行比较。结果指标为预测误差,以算术误差表示,以及观察到的屈光与预测屈光之间的绝对误差。
对来自2个中心的243例病例进行了研究。海吉斯公式、霍弗Q公式、霍拉迪1公式和SRK/T公式之间未发现显著差异,但SRK/T公式除外,在眼轴长度(AL)大于27.0 mm的眼中,SRK/T公式的表现优于其他薄透镜公式(P<0.01)。与SRK/T公式相比,奥尔森公式在两个系列中的平均绝对误差分别改善了15%和14%,大误差(>1.0 D)数量分别减少了39%和85%(P<0.0001)。与奥尔森公式相反,所有薄透镜公式在AL、角膜曲率读数和眼前节长度方面均表现出显著偏差(P<0.0001)。
C常数是用于光线追踪辅助IOL屈光力计算的一个有前景的概念。