Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Taipei Medical University-Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Arthroscopy. 2014 Jul;30(7):823-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.041. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
To compare the clinical outcomes of femoral knot/press-fit anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with conventional techniques using femoral interference screws.
Among patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with hamstring autografts, 73 were treated with either a femoral knot/press-fit technique (40 patients, group A) or femoral interference screw fixation (33 patients, group B). The clinical results of the 2 groups were retrospectively compared. The inclusion criteria were primary ACL reconstruction in active patients. The exclusion criteria were fractures, multiligamentous injuries, patients undergoing revision, or patients with contralateral ACL-deficient knees. In the femoral knot/press-fit technique, semitendinosus and gracilis tendons were prepared as 2 loops with knots. After passage through a bottleneck femoral tunnel, the grafts were fixed with a press-fit method (grafts' knots were stuck in the bottleneck of the femoral tunnel). A tie with Mersilene tape (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) over a bone bridge for each tendon loop and an additional bioabsorbable interference screw were used for tibial fixation.
The mean follow-up period was 38 months (range, 24 to 61 months). A significant improvement in knee function and symptoms was reported in most patients, as shown by improved Tegner scores, Lysholm knee scores, and International Knee Documentation Committee assessments (P < .01). The results of instrumented laxity testing, thigh muscle assessment, and radiologic assessment were clearly improved when compared with the preoperative status (P < .01). No statistically significant difference in outcomes could be observed between group A and group B (P = not significant).
In this nonrandomized study, femoral knot/press-fit ACL reconstruction did not appear to provide increased anterior instability compared with that of conventional femoral interference screw ACL reconstruction. Favorable outcomes with regard to knee stability and patient satisfaction were achieved in most of our ACL-reconstructed patients using femoral knot/press-fit fixation with hamstring tendon autograft.
Level IV, therapeutic case series.
比较使用股骨纽扣/压配合技术与传统股骨干扰螺钉固定技术进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的临床效果。
在接受关节镜下 ACL 重建的患者中,73 例患者分别采用股骨纽扣/压配合技术(40 例,A 组)或股骨干扰螺钉固定(33 例,B 组)。回顾性比较两组的临床结果。纳入标准为活跃患者的初次 ACL 重建。排除标准为骨折、多韧带损伤、翻修患者或对侧 ACL 缺失膝关节患者。在股骨纽扣/压配合技术中,半腱肌和股薄肌肌腱制备成 2 个环并用结固定。在穿过瓶颈股骨隧道后,使用压配合方法固定移植物(移植物的结卡在股骨隧道的瓶颈处)。每个肌腱环上使用 Mersilene 带(Ethicon,Somerville,NJ)进行骨桥结扎,并使用额外的可吸收干扰螺钉进行胫骨固定。
平均随访时间为 38 个月(范围 24 至 61 个月)。大多数患者报告膝关节功能和症状明显改善,Tegner 评分、Lysholm 膝关节评分和国际膝关节文献委员会评估均有所提高(P <.01)。与术前相比,仪器测膝关节松弛度、大腿肌肉评估和影像学评估结果均明显改善(P <.01)。A 组和 B 组之间的结果无统计学差异(P 不显著)。
在这项非随机研究中,与传统股骨干扰螺钉 ACL 重建相比,股骨纽扣/压配合 ACL 重建并未增加前向不稳定。使用股骨纽扣/压配合固定带自体肌腱重建 ACL 后,大多数患者膝关节稳定性和患者满意度均取得良好效果。
IV 级,治疗性病例系列。