• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

商业牛肉加工厂去皮技术(上削法和下削法)的微生物评估。

Microbial assessment of an upward and downward dehiding technique in a commercial beef processing plant.

机构信息

Veterinary Public Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Agriculture House, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland; NICHE, School of Biomedical Science, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland; School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.

NICHE, School of Biomedical Science, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland; School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Meat Sci. 2014 Aug;97(4):486-9. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.03.009
PMID:24769148
Abstract

Preventing microbial contamination during dehiding is challenging, and skinning methods are of critical importance for the hygienic status of beef carcasses. Two skinning methods are usually employed: upward hide pulling (UHP) and downward hide pulling (DHP). This study has compared the microbiological contamination of carcasses using both systems in a beef processing plant in the process of changing its dehiding method from UHP to DHP. 100 cm(2) areas from eight carcass sites (ham, chuck, rump, bung, flank, brisket, shin and neck) were sampled on 36 skinned carcasses dehided by each technique. Total viable counts (TVCs) and Enterobacteriaceae counts for each site were determined. No significant differences were observed in total (pooled-samples) carcass contamination regardless of the method used. However, significant differences (p<0.05) in TVCs were observed at the flank, shin, brisket and neck. These differences can be attributed to possible deficiencies in the implementation of the HACCP pre-requisite programmes, and are not necessarily associated with the skinning method per se.

摘要

在去皮过程中防止微生物污染具有挑战性,去皮方法对于牛肉胴体的卫生状况至关重要。通常采用两种去皮方法:向上拉皮(UHP)和向下拉皮(DHP)。本研究比较了在一家牛肉加工厂中,将去皮方法从 UHP 改为 DHP 时,两种系统对胴体的微生物污染情况。在 36 个用两种技术去皮的胴体上,从八个胴体部位(火腿、肩肉、臀肉、肩部、肋腹肉、胸肉、小腿和脖子)采集了 100 cm²的面积。对每个部位的总活菌计数(TVC)和肠杆菌计数进行了测定。无论使用哪种方法,总(混合样本)胴体污染均无显著差异。然而,在肋腹肉、小腿、胸肉和脖子处观察到 TVC 存在显著差异(p<0.05)。这些差异可能归因于 HACCP 前提方案实施中存在的缺陷,而不一定与去皮方法本身有关。

相似文献

1
Microbial assessment of an upward and downward dehiding technique in a commercial beef processing plant.商业牛肉加工厂去皮技术(上削法和下削法)的微生物评估。
Meat Sci. 2014 Aug;97(4):486-9. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
2
Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.两家屠宰场中牛胴体在不同屠宰阶段的微生物污染情况。
Meat Sci. 2014 Oct;98(2):198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 8.
3
Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.基于欧盟第2001/471/EC号决定所使用标准的牛肉微生物污染与卫生评估的关系
Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Apr 15;92(2):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.09.010.
4
The relationship between hide cleanliness and bacterial numbers on beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir.一家商业屠宰场中牛皮清洁度与牛 carcasses 上细菌数量之间的关系。 (注:这里carcasses常见释义为“屠体” )
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2000 May;30(5):390-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2000.00739.x.
5
Microbial contamination of meat during the skinning of beef carcass hindquarters at three slaughtering plants.三家屠宰厂在牛胴体后躯去皮过程中肉类的微生物污染情况。
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Jul 21;42(3):175-84. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00074-9.
6
Comparison of aerial counts at different sites in beef and sheep abattoirs and the relationship between aerial and beef carcass contamination.比较不同地点在牛和羊屠宰场的空中计数和空中与牛肉胴体污染之间的关系。
Food Microbiol. 2012 Dec;32(2):325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
7
Determination of the principal points of product contamination during beef carcass dressing processes in Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰牛肉胴体屠宰加工过程中产品污染主要点的确定。
J Food Prot. 2004 Jul;67(7):1494-6. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1494.
8
The significance of clean and dirty animals for bacterial dynamics along the beef chain.清洁动物和肮脏动物对牛肉链中细菌动态的意义。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Dec 2;214:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
9
Microbiological effects of a routine treatment for decontaminating hide-on carcasses at a large beef packing plant.一家大型牛肉加工厂对带皮胴体进行去污常规处理的微生物学效应
J Food Prot. 2015 Feb;78(2):256-63. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-226.
10
Aerobic Mesophilic, Coliform, , and Counts of Raw Meat from the Formal and Informal Meat Sectors in South Africa.南非正规和非正规肉类行业生肉中的需氧嗜温菌、大肠菌群和 计数。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 21;15(4):819. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040819.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs.澳大利亚出口牛肉屠宰场屠宰过程中16S rRNA谱的比较
Front Microbiol. 2019 Nov 29;10:2747. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02747. eCollection 2019.