• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evolutionary constraints or opportunities?进化的限制还是机遇?
Biosystems. 2014 Apr 22;120C:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.04.005.
2
Evolutionary constraints or opportunities?进化的限制还是机遇?
Biosystems. 2014 Sep;123:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
3
Evolution of evolvability and phenotypic plasticity in virtual cells.虚拟细胞中可进化性与表型可塑性的演变
BMC Evol Biol. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0918-y.
4
Neurogenomics and the role of a large mutational target on rapid behavioral change.神经基因组学以及大突变靶点在快速行为变化中的作用。
Biol Direct. 2016 Nov 8;11(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13062-016-0162-1.
5
Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environments: an empirical test of the Baldwin effect.新环境中表型顺应的进化意义:对鲍德温效应的实证检验
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 27;364(1520):1125-41. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0285.
6
Emergence of phenotypic plasticity through epigenetic mechanisms.通过表观遗传机制实现表型可塑性的出现。
Evol Lett. 2024 Mar 27;8(4):561-574. doi: 10.1093/evlett/qrae012. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.发育偏差与进化:调控网络视角
Genetics. 2018 Aug;209(4):949-966. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.300995.
8
A scenario for an evolutionary selection of ageing.衰老的进化选择场景。
Elife. 2024 Nov 1;13:RP92914. doi: 10.7554/eLife.92914.
9
The Evolutionary Complexities of DNA Methylation in Animals: From Plasticity to Genetic Evolution.动物 DNA 甲基化的进化复杂性:从可塑性到遗传进化。
Genome Biol Evol. 2023 Dec 1;15(12). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evad216.
10
The Role of Stochasticity in the Origin of Epigenetic Variation in Animal Populations.动物种群中表观遗传变异起源的随机性作用。
Integr Comp Biol. 2020 Dec 16;60(6):1544-1557. doi: 10.1093/icb/icaa047.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving Perspective on the Origin and Diversification of Cellular Life and the Virosphere.关于细胞生命和病毒圈起源与多样化的不断演变的观点。
Genome Biol Evol. 2022 May 31;14(6). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evac034.
2
Virus is a Signal for the Host Cell.病毒是宿主细胞的一种信号。
Biosemiotics. 2015;8(3):483-491. doi: 10.1007/s12304-015-9245-0. Epub 2015 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY.多变量进化的定量遗传分析,应用于脑体大小异速生长
Evolution. 1979 Mar;33(1Part2):402-416. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04694.x.
2
Genetic basis of neurocognitive decline and reduced white-matter integrity in normal human brain aging.正常人大脑衰老中神经认知能力下降和白质完整性降低的遗传基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 19;110(47):19006-11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313735110. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
3
Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer: advancements and problems.种间体细胞核移植:进展与问题
Cell Reprogram. 2013 Oct;15(5):374-84. doi: 10.1089/cell.2013.0036. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
4
Characterization of constitutive CTCF/cohesin loci: a possible role in establishing topological domains in mammalian genomes.描述组成型 CTCF/黏合蛋白的位置:在哺乳动物基因组中建立拓扑结构域的可能作用。
BMC Genomics. 2013 Aug 14;14:553. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-553.
5
Lineage Selection and the Maintenance of Sex.谱系选择与性别的维持
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 18;8(6):e66906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066906. Print 2013.
6
Functional Information: Towards Synthesis of Biosemiotics and Cybernetics.功能信息:迈向生物符号学与控制论的综合
Entropy (Basel). 2010 Apr 27;12(5):1050-1070. doi: 10.3390/e12051050.
7
Evolution of adaptive phenotypic traits without positive Darwinian selection.没有正向达尔文选择的适应性表型性状的进化。
Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Apr;108(4):347-53. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2011.97. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
8
From adaptation to molecular evolution.从适应到分子进化。
Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Apr;108(4):457-9. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2011.96. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
9
Evo-devo and accounting for Darwin's endless forms.演化发育生物学与达尔文无尽形式的解释
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 27;366(1574):2069-75. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0007.
10
Second-order selection for evolvability in a large Escherichia coli population.在大肠杆菌群体中进行可进化性的二阶选择。
Science. 2011 Mar 18;331(6023):1433-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1198914.

进化的限制还是机遇?

Evolutionary constraints or opportunities?

作者信息

Sharov Alexei A

机构信息

National Institute on Aging, Genetics Laboratory, 251 Bayview Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Biosystems. 2014 Apr 22;120C:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.04.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.04.005
PMID:24769155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4206685/
Abstract

Natural selection is traditionally viewed as a leading factor of evolution, whereas variation is assumed to be random and non-directional. Any order in variation is attributed to epigenetic or developmental constraints that can hinder the action of natural selection. In contrast I consider the positive role of epigenetic mechanisms in evolution because they provide organisms with opportunities for rapid adaptive change. Because the term "constraint" has negative connotations, I use the term "regulated variation" to emphasize the adaptive nature of phenotypic variation, which helps populations and species to survive and evolve in changing environments. The capacity to produce regulated variation is a phenotypic property, which is not described in the genome. Instead, the genome acts as a switchboard, where mostly random mutations switch "on" or "off" preexisting functional capacities of organism components. Thus, there are two channels of heredity: informational (genomic) and structure-functional (phenotypic). Functional capacities of organisms most likely emerged in a chain of modifications and combinations of more simple ancestral functions. The role of DNA has been to keep records of these changes (without describing the result) so that they can be reproduced in the following generations. Evolutionary opportunities include adjustments of individual functions, multitasking, connection between various components of an organism, and interaction between organisms. The adaptive nature of regulated variation can be explained by the differential success of lineages in macro-evolution. Lineages with more advantageous patterns of regulated variation are likely to produce more species and secure more resources (i.e., long-term lineage selection).

摘要

传统上,自然选择被视为进化的主要因素,而变异则被认为是随机且无方向的。变异中的任何秩序都归因于表观遗传或发育限制,这些限制可能会阻碍自然选择的作用。相比之下,我认为表观遗传机制在进化中具有积极作用,因为它们为生物体提供了快速适应性变化的机会。由于“限制”一词具有负面含义,我使用“调控变异”一词来强调表型变异的适应性本质,这有助于种群和物种在不断变化的环境中生存和进化。产生调控变异的能力是一种表型特性,在基因组中并未描述。相反,基因组就像一个总机,大多数随机突变在这里“开启”或“关闭”生物体组成部分预先存在的功能能力。因此,存在两种遗传渠道:信息性(基因组)和结构功能性(表型)。生物体的功能能力很可能是在一系列更简单的祖先功能的修饰和组合中出现的。DNA的作用是记录这些变化(而不描述结果),以便它们能够在后代中重现。进化机会包括个体功能的调整、多任务处理、生物体各个组成部分之间的联系以及生物体之间的相互作用。调控变异的适应性本质可以通过宏观进化中谱系的不同成功来解释。具有更有利调控变异模式的谱系可能会产生更多物种并获取更多资源(即长期谱系选择)。