Rathinam Sridhar, Oey Inger, Steiner Mick, Spyt Tom, Morgan Mike D, Waller David A
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Dec;46(6):1021-6; discussion 1026. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu129. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for advanced emphysema is well established, with strong evidence from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. However, there is still reluctance to offer the procedure, and many have looked for alternative, unproven treatments. The multidisciplinary approach has been well established in treatment of lung cancer and, more recently, in coronary artery surgery. We reviewed our practice to validate the role of our multidisciplinary team approach in our LVRS programme.
Our multidisciplinary approach employs respiratory physicians, radiologists and surgeons involved in case selection, who meet on a regular basis. Cases are selected on the basis of clinical presentation, imaging (radionuclide lung perfusion and computerized tomography) and respiratory physiology. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 633 patients referred for lung volume reduction surgery between July 1995 and July 2013.
Six hundred and thirty-three patients (422 male) were referred for LVRS, of whom 253 [178 male; median age 61 years (range 37-79 years)] underwent 292 LVRS procedures.There were 268 video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical procedures, of which 13 were one-stage bilateral procedures and 37 required a staged second side. Overall median hospital stay was 13 (4-197) days, during which 11 patients died. Prolonged hospital stay was associated with increasing age and with duration of air leak, which in turn was associated with diffusion capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s.
The outcomes of a successful LVRS programme are not only dependent on good surgical technique and post-operative care. Case selection and work-up by a dedicated multidisciplinary approach for emphysema patients plays an invaluable and integral part in an LVRS programme.
晚期肺气肿的肺减容手术(LVRS)已得到充分确立,国家肺气肿治疗试验提供了有力证据。然而,人们对于提供该手术仍有所顾虑,许多人一直在寻找未经证实的替代治疗方法。多学科方法在肺癌治疗中已得到充分确立,最近在冠状动脉手术中也是如此。我们回顾了我们的实践,以验证我们的多学科团队方法在LVRS项目中的作用。
我们的多学科方法采用参与病例选择的呼吸内科医生、放射科医生和外科医生,他们定期会面。根据临床表现、影像学检查(放射性核素肺灌注和计算机断层扫描)和呼吸生理学来选择病例。对1995年7月至2013年7月期间转诊接受肺减容手术的633例患者的前瞻性收集数据进行回顾性分析。
633例患者(422例男性)转诊接受LVRS,其中253例[178例男性;中位年龄61岁(范围37 - 79岁)]接受了292次LVRS手术。有268例电视辅助胸腔镜手术,其中13例为一期双侧手术,37例需要分期进行另一侧手术。总体中位住院时间为13(4 - 197)天,在此期间有11例患者死亡。住院时间延长与年龄增加以及漏气持续时间有关,而漏气持续时间又与弥散功能和第1秒用力呼气量有关。
成功的LVRS项目的结果不仅取决于良好的手术技术和术后护理。针对肺气肿患者采用专门的多学科方法进行病例选择和检查在LVRS项目中起着至关重要且不可或缺的作用。