Vos Rimke C, Dallmeijer Annet J, Verhoef Marjolein, Van Schie Petra E M, Voorman Jeanine M, Wiegerink Diana J H G, Geytenbeek Joke J M, Roebroeck Marij E, Becher Jules G
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Oct;56(10):951-9. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12473. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
The aim of this study was to determine the developmental trajectories of expressive (speech) and receptive (spoken and written language) communication by type of motor disorder and intellectual disability in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP).
The development of 418 participants (261 males, 157 females; mean age 9y 6mo [SD 6y 2mo], range 1-24y; Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I [n=206], II [n=57], III [n=59], IV [n=54], V [n=42]) was followed for 2 to 4 years in a longitudinal study. Communication performance was measured using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. The type of motor disorder was differentiated by type of CP as unilateral spastic (USCP, n=161), bilateral spastic (BSCP, n=202), and non-spastic (NSCP, n=55), while intellectual disability was determined by IQ or school type (regular or special). A multilevel analysis was then used to model the developmental trajectories.
The most favourable development of expressive communication was seen in USCP (vs BSCP β [SE]-2.74 [1.06], NSCP β [SE]-2.67 [1.44]). The difference between the development trajectory levels of children with and without intellectual disability was smaller for children with USCP than for those with BSCP and NSCP. For receptive communication, the most favourable development was found for all children with USCP and for BSCP or NSCP without intellectual disability (vs intellectual disability β [SE]-4.00 [1.16]). Development of written language was most favourable for children without intellectual disability (vs intellectual disability β [SE]-23.11 [2.85]).
The development of expressive communication was found to be most closely related to type of motor disorder, whereas the development of receptive communication was found to be most closely related to intellectual disability.
本研究旨在确定脑瘫(CP)患者中,按运动障碍类型和智力残疾情况划分的表达性(言语)和接受性(口语和书面语言)交流的发展轨迹。
在一项纵向研究中,对418名参与者(261名男性,157名女性;平均年龄9岁6个月[标准差6岁2个月],范围1 - 24岁;粗大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)I级[n = 206],II级[n = 57],III级[n = 59],IV级[n = 54],V级[n = 42])进行了2至4年的随访。使用文兰适应行为量表测量交流表现。运动障碍类型根据脑瘫类型分为单侧痉挛型(USCP,n = 161)、双侧痉挛型(BSCP,n = 202)和非痉挛型(NSCP,n = 55),而智力残疾则通过智商或学校类型(普通或特殊)来确定。然后使用多水平分析对发展轨迹进行建模。
在表达性交流方面,USCP组的发展最为良好(与BSCP相比β[标准误] - 2.74 [1.06],与NSCP相比β[标准误] - 2.67 [1.44])。与无智力残疾的儿童相比,USCP组有智力残疾和无智力残疾儿童的发展轨迹水平差异小于BSCP组和NSCP组。对于接受性交流,所有USCP儿童以及无智力残疾的BSCP或NSCP儿童的发展最为良好(与有智力残疾相比β[标准误] - 4.00 [1.16])。对于无智力残疾的儿童,书面语言发展最为良好(与有智力残疾相比β[标准误] - 23.11 [2.85])。
研究发现,表达性交流的发展与运动障碍类型关系最为密切,而接受性交流的发展与智力残疾关系最为密切。