Suppr超能文献

一种用于慢性前列腺炎患者表型分析的在线UPOINT工具。

An online UPOINT tool for phenotyping patients with chronic prostatitis.

作者信息

Tran Christine N, Li Jianbo, Shoskes Daniel A

机构信息

The Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Can J Urol. 2014 Apr;21(2):7195-200.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the clinical phenotypes of patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) using a web based online tool and to compare these clinical features with patients evaluated in a tertiary referral clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was collected from 720 men who gave complete online responses on a website which determines the UPOINT clinical phenotype in CP/CPPS and measures symptom severity with the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). This was compared to phenotype and symptom severity of 220 patients evaluated in person at a tertiary referral clinic.

RESULTS

The web-based cohort had CPSI scores of 11.1, 4.8, 7.6, and 23.6 for pain, urinary, quality-of-life, and total score, respectively. The percentage of patients positive for each domain was 76%, 74%, 75%, 10%, 46%, and 75% for the urinary, psychosocial, organ specific, infection, neurologic/systemic, and tenderness domains, respectively. There was a positive correlation between CPSI and number of positive UPOINT domains (p = 0.25, p < 0.0001). Comparison between web- and clinic-based groups showed that the clinic group had fewer UPOINT positive domains compared to the web-based group (2.9 versus 3.6, p < 0.0001), but had worse quality-of-life (9.0 versus 7.6, p < 0.0001) and CPSI total scores (25.0 versus 23.6, p = 0.0052).

CONCLUSIONS

Men using an online tool to clinically phenotype CP/CPPS show similar correlations between UPOINT domains, symptom severity, age and duration. While symptom severity was worse in patients seen in a tertiary referral clinic, the differences were small.

摘要

引言

使用基于网络的在线工具评估慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)患者的临床表型,并将这些临床特征与在三级转诊诊所评估的患者进行比较。

材料与方法

从720名男性收集数据,这些男性在一个网站上给出了完整的在线回复,该网站可确定CP/CPPS的UPOINT临床表型,并使用美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)测量症状严重程度。将其与在三级转诊诊所亲自评估的220名患者的表型和症状严重程度进行比较。

结果

基于网络的队列中,疼痛、泌尿、生活质量和总分的CPSI评分分别为11.1、4.8、7.6和23.6。泌尿、心理社会、器官特异性、感染、神经/全身和压痛领域中各领域阳性患者的百分比分别为76%、74%、75%、10%、46%和75%。CPSI与UPOINT阳性领域数量之间存在正相关(p = 0.25,p < 0.0001)。基于网络的组与基于诊所的组之间的比较表明,诊所组的UPOINT阳性领域比基于网络的组少(2.9对3.6,p < 0.0001),但生活质量更差(9.0对7.6,p < 0.0001),CPSI总分更高(25.0对23.6,p = 0.0052)。

结论

使用在线工具对CP/CPPS进行临床表型分析的男性,其UPOINT领域、症状严重程度、年龄和病程之间的相关性相似。虽然在三级转诊诊所就诊的患者症状严重程度更差,但差异较小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验