Webb Travis P, Merkley Taylor R, Wade Thomas J, Simpson Deborah, Yudkowsky Rachel, Harris Ilene
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
J Surg Educ. 2014 Jul-Aug;71(4):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.01.019. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
Graduate medical education is undergoing a dramatic shift toward competency-based assessment of learners. Competency assessment requires clear definitions of competency and validated assessment methods. The purpose of this study is to identify criteria used by surgical educators to judge competence in Practice-Based Learning and Improvement (PBL&I) as demonstrated in learning portfolios.
A total of 6 surgical learning and instructional portfolio entries served as documents to be assessed by 3 senior surgical educators. These faculty members were asked to rate and then identify criteria used to assess PBL&I competency. Individual interviews and group discussions were conducted, recorded, and transcribed to serve as the study dataset. Analysis was performed using qualitative methodology to identify themes for the purpose of defining competence in PBL&I. The assessment themes derived are presented with narrative examples to describe the progression of competency.
The collaborative coding process resulted in identification of 7 themes associated with competency in PBL&I related to surgical learning and instructional portfolio entries: (1) self-awareness regarding effect of actions; (2) identification and thorough description of learning goals; (3) cases used as catalyst for reflection; (4) reconceptualization with appropriate use and critique of cited literature; (5) communication skills/completeness of entry template; (6) description of future behavioral change; and (7) engagement in process--identifies as personally relevant.
The identified themes are consistent with and complement other criteria emerging from reflective practice literature and experiential learning theory. This study provides a foundation for further development of a tool for assessing learner portfolios consistent with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Next Accreditation System requirements.
毕业后医学教育正在经历一场向基于能力的学习者评估的巨大转变。能力评估需要对能力有清晰的定义以及经过验证的评估方法。本研究的目的是确定外科教育工作者用于判断基于实践的学习与改进(PBL&I)能力的标准,这在学习档案中有所体现。
共有6份外科学习和教学档案条目作为待评估文件,由3位资深外科教育工作者进行评估。要求这些教员进行评分,然后确定用于评估PBL&I能力的标准。进行了个人访谈和小组讨论,进行记录并转录,作为研究数据集。使用定性方法进行分析,以确定用于定义PBL&I能力的主题。得出的评估主题配有叙述性示例,以描述能力的发展过程。
协作编码过程确定了7个与外科学习和教学档案条目相关的PBL&I能力主题:(1)对行动效果的自我意识;(2)学习目标的识别和全面描述;(3)用作反思催化剂的案例;(4)通过适当使用和批判引用文献进行重新概念化;(5)沟通技巧/条目模板的完整性;(6)对未来行为改变的描述;(7)参与过程——确定为个人相关。
所确定的主题与反思性实践文献和体验式学习理论中出现的其他标准一致且相辅相成。本研究为进一步开发符合毕业后医学教育认证委员会下一认证系统要求的学习者档案评估工具奠定了基础。