• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科手术档案:一项系统性综述。

Surgical portfolios: A systematic scoping review.

作者信息

Chong Eleanor Jia Xin, Wang Ming Jia, Lim Jia Yin, Shen Grace Shen, Chow Misha Jing Yi, Koh Kai Kee, Lim Annabelle Jia Sing, Hong Daniel Zhihao, Ting Jacquelin Jia Qi, Pisupati Anushka, Lam Betrand Kai Yang, Ong Yun Ting, Chiam Min, Mason Stephen, Krishna Lalit Kumar Radha, Tan Si Ying

机构信息

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore.

Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610 Singapore.

出版信息

Surg Pract Sci. 2022 Jul 6;10:100107. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100107. eCollection 2022 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100107
PMID:39845583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11749990/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The need for longitudinal and comprehensive evidenced development of surgical knowledge, skills and attitudes, and the attainment of appropriate competencies have spotlighted portfolio use. Yet variations in structure, content and roles as well as its resource-heavy reputation have limited its impact. The purpose of this study is to map prevailing data on the use of portfolios in postgraduate surgical education to address a lack of e-portfolio use and guide its design and structuring in surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Systematic Evidenced Based Approach (SEBA) guided systematic scoping review (SSR) (SSR in SEBA) was conducted to map prevailing data. The constructivist ontological approach used allowed for enhanced reflexivity in the analysis and discussion.

RESULTS

13,092 articles were reviewed, 839 full-text articles were evaluated, and 37 articles were included. Concurrent thematic and content analysis revealed similar themes and categories which were the role of portfolios, evaluation of portfolio use, and implementation of e-portfolios.

DISCUSSION

Lessons from traditional surgical portfolios can be employed to enhance the design, support and utility of e-portfolios and yet maintain as a balanced trainee-led perspective of their progress. Focused on documenting the trainee's competencies, achievements, experiences, feedback, and reflections, a variety of methods are presently used to assess the reliability, validity, educational impact, acceptability and feasibility of surgical portfolios. The use of e-portfolios, in particular, has been adopted due to its accessibility, portability and convenience. Beyond its flexibility in access, repository and content, e-portfolios offer increased user accessibility, better quality interactions and smoother facilitation, clarification, and feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

The data in this SSR in SEBA underscores the need for systematic assessment tools to evaluate e-portfolio as well as evaluate the programs as a whole. Further research into training mentors to support e-portfolio use, assess progress and ensure effective oversight of e-portfolios are required.

摘要

引言

外科知识、技能和态度的纵向与全面循证发展以及获得适当能力的需求,凸显了档案袋的使用。然而,其结构、内容和作用的差异以及资源消耗大的名声限制了其影响。本研究的目的是梳理研究生外科教育中档案袋使用的现有数据,以解决电子档案袋使用不足的问题,并指导其在外科领域的设计和构建。

材料与方法

采用基于循证的系统方法(SEBA)指导的系统综述(SEBA中的SSR)来梳理现有数据。所采用的建构主义本体论方法在分析和讨论中增强了反思性。

结果

共检索了13092篇文章,评估了839篇全文文章,纳入了37篇文章。同时进行的主题和内容分析揭示了相似的主题和类别,即档案袋的作用、档案袋使用的评估以及电子档案袋的实施。

讨论

传统外科档案袋的经验教训可用于改进电子档案袋的设计、支持和效用,同时保持以学员为主导的关于其进展的平衡视角。目前采用了多种方法来评估外科档案袋的可靠性、有效性、教育影响、可接受性和可行性,重点是记录学员的能力、成就、经验、反馈和反思。特别是电子档案袋因其可访问性、便携性和便利性而被采用。除了在访问、存储库和内容方面的灵活性外,电子档案袋还提供了更高的用户可及性、更好的质量互动以及更顺畅的促进、澄清和反馈。

结论

本SEBA中的SSR数据强调需要系统评估工具来评估电子档案袋以及整体评估项目。需要进一步研究培训导师以支持电子档案袋的使用、评估进展并确保对电子档案袋进行有效监督。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3729/11749990/7b42bd7a7ab4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3729/11749990/94be62e5b6c9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3729/11749990/7b42bd7a7ab4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3729/11749990/94be62e5b6c9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3729/11749990/7b42bd7a7ab4/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical portfolios: A systematic scoping review.外科手术档案:一项系统性综述。
Surg Pract Sci. 2022 Jul 6;10:100107. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100107. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Evidence-guided approach to portfolio-guided teaching and assessing communications, ethics and professionalism for medical students and physicians: a systematic scoping review.循证方法在医学生和医生的沟通、伦理和专业精神的课程设置和评估中的应用:系统的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e067048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067048.
3
A Systematic Scoping Review on Portfolios of Medical Educators.医学教育工作者作品集的系统综述性研究
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021 Mar 24;8:23821205211000356. doi: 10.1177/23821205211000356. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
4
Medical Student Portfolios: A Systematic Scoping Review.医学生档案袋:一项系统性综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Mar 3;9:23821205221076022. doi: 10.1177/23821205221076022. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
Portfolio use in postgraduate medical education: a systematic scoping review.研究生医学教育中的组合投资:系统范围界定审查。
Postgrad Med J. 2023 Jul 21;99(1174):913-927. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgac007.
7
Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review.研究生伦理培训计划:系统范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 9;21(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02644-5.
8
The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12.研究生评估与教育组合的有效性:BEME指南第12号
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):299-318. doi: 10.1080/01421590902883056.
9
A Systematic Scoping Review on Pedagogical Strategies of Interprofessional Communication for Physicians in Emergency Medicine.急诊医学领域医生跨专业沟通教学策略的系统综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021 Oct 16;8:23821205211041794. doi: 10.1177/23821205211041794. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
10
Portfolios: possibilities for addressing emergency medicine resident competencies.组合档案:应对急诊医学住院医师能力的可能性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;9(11):1305-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01592.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic scoping review of mentor training in medical education between 2000 and 2024.2000年至2024年医学教育中导师培训的系统综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):1110. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07353-x.
2
The impact of death and caring for the dying and their families on surgeons - an AI assisted systematic scoping review.死亡以及照顾临终患者及其家属对外科医生的影响——一项人工智能辅助的系统综述。
BMC Surg. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02792-1.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Scoping Review on Portfolios of Medical Educators.医学教育工作者作品集的系统综述性研究
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021 Mar 24;8:23821205211000356. doi: 10.1177/23821205211000356. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
A systematic scoping review of approaches to teaching and assessing empathy in medicine.系统评价医学中同理心教学和评估方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 May 22;21(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02697-6.
3
Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests.
书签法和 Angoff 标准设定法在医学绩效测试中有效性的比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 2;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02436-3.
4
The impact of death and dying on the personhood of medical students: a systematic scoping review.死亡和濒死对医学生人格的影响:系统范围界定综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 28;20(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02411-y.
5
A systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of interprofessional mentoring in medicine from 2000 to 2019.一项对 2000 年至 2019 年医学领域跨专业指导的系统范围综述和主题分析。
J Interprof Care. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):927-939. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1818700. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
6
The impact of caring for dying patients in intensive care units on a physician's personhood: a systematic scoping review.重症监护病房中照顾临终患者对医生人格的影响:一项系统的范围综述。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2020 Nov 25;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13010-020-00096-1.
7
Assessing Professionalism in Medicine - A Scoping Review of Assessment Tools from 1990 to 2018.评估医学领域的职业素养——对1990年至2018年评估工具的范围综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Oct 16;7:2382120520955159. doi: 10.1177/2382120520955159. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
8
Interprofessional communication (IPC) for medical students: a scoping review.医学生的跨专业交流(IPC):一项范围综述
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 16;20(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02296-x.
9
Enhancing Mentoring in Palliative Care: An Evidence Based Mentoring Framework.加强姑息治疗中的指导:一个基于证据的指导框架。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Sep 23;7:2382120520957649. doi: 10.1177/2382120520957649. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
10
Impact of Caring for Terminally Ill Children on Physicians: A Systematic Scoping Review.照顾绝症儿童对医生的影响:系统范围综述。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Apr;38(4):396-418. doi: 10.1177/1049909120950301. Epub 2020 Aug 20.