Wüthrich Thomas U, Eberle Elisabeth C, Spengler Christina M
Exercise Physiology Lab, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Aug;114(8):1619-33. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2889-7. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
Fatigue in leg muscles might differ between running and cycling due to inherent differences in muscle activation patterns. Moreover, postural demand placed upon the diaphragm during running could augment the development of diaphragm fatigue.
We investigated quadriceps and diaphragm fatigue in 11 runners and 11 cyclists (age: 29 ± 5 years; [Formula: see text]O2,peak: 66.9 ± 5.5 ml min(-1) kg(-1)) by assessing quadriceps twitch force (Q tw) and transdiaphragmatic twitch pressure (P di,tw) before and after 15- and 30-min time-trials (15TT, 30TT). Inspiratory muscle fatigue was also obtained after volitional normocapnic hyperpnoea (NH) where postural demand is negligible. We hypothesized that running and cycling would induce different patterns of fatigue and that runners would develop less respiratory muscle fatigue when performing NH.
The reduction in Q tw was greater in cyclists (32 ± 6 %) compared to runners (13 ± 8 %, p < 0.01), but not different for 15TTs (23 ± 13 %) and 30TTs (21 ± 11 %, p = 0.34). Overall P di,tw was more reduced after 15TTs (24 ± 8 %) than after 30TTs (20 ± 9 %, p = 0.04) while being similar for runners and cyclists (p = 0.78). Meanwhile, breathing duration in NH and the magnitude of inspiratory muscle fatigue were also not different (both p > 0.05).
Different levels of leg muscle fatigue in runners and cyclists could in part be related to the specific muscle activation patterns including concentric contractions in both modalities but eccentric contractions in runners only. Diaphragm fatigue likely resulted from the large ventilatory load which is characteristic for both exercise modalities and which was higher in 15TTs than in 30TTs (+27 %, p < 0.01) while postural demand appears to be of less importance.
由于肌肉激活模式的内在差异,跑步和骑自行车时腿部肌肉的疲劳情况可能有所不同。此外,跑步过程中横膈膜所承受的姿势要求可能会加剧横膈膜疲劳的发展。
我们通过评估11名跑步者和11名骑自行车者(年龄:29±5岁;[公式:见正文]O2峰值:66.9±5.5毫升·分钟−1·千克−1)在15分钟和30分钟计时赛(15TT、30TT)前后的股四头肌抽搐力(Q tw)和经横膈膜抽搐压力(P di,tw),来研究股四头肌和横膈膜疲劳情况。在意志性等碳酸血症过度通气(NH)后也获取吸气肌疲劳情况,此时姿势要求可忽略不计。我们假设跑步和骑自行车会诱发不同的疲劳模式,并且跑步者在进行NH时会产生较少的呼吸肌疲劳。
与跑步者(13±8%,p<0.01)相比,骑自行车者的Q tw降低幅度更大(32±6%),但15TT(23±13%)和30TT(21±11%,p = 0.34)时并无差异。总体而言,15TT后P di,tw的降低幅度(24±8%)大于30TT后(20±9%,p = 0.04),而跑步者和骑自行车者的情况相似(p = 0.78)。同时,NH时的呼吸持续时间和吸气肌疲劳程度也无差异(两者p>0.05)。
跑步者和骑自行车者腿部肌肉疲劳程度不同,部分原因可能与特定的肌肉激活模式有关,包括两种运动方式中的向心收缩,但仅跑步者存在离心收缩。横膈膜疲劳可能是由于两种运动方式共有的较大通气负荷导致的,且15TT时的通气负荷高于30TT(高27%,p<0.01),而姿势要求似乎不太重要。