• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CLARA:一个集成的临床研究管理系统。

CLARA: an integrated clinical research administration system.

机构信息

Division of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA Research Systems, Information Technology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

Department of Computer Science, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct;21(e2):e369-73. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002616. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002616
PMID:24778201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4173184/
Abstract

Administration of human subject research is complex, involving not only the institutional review board but also many other regulatory and compliance entities within a research enterprise. Its efficiency has a direct and substantial impact on the conduct and management of clinical research. In this paper, we report on the Clinical Research Administration (CLARA) platform developed at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. CLARA is a comprehensive web-based system that can streamline research administrative tasks such as submissions, reviews, and approval processes for both investigators and different review committees on a single integrated platform. CLARA not only helps investigators to meet regulatory requirements but also provides tools for managing other clinical research activities including budgeting, contracting, and participant schedule planning.

摘要

管理人体研究是复杂的,不仅涉及机构审查委员会,还涉及研究机构内的许多其他监管和合规实体。其效率直接且实质性地影响临床研究的开展和管理。在本文中,我们报告了阿肯色大学医学科学分校开发的临床研究管理(CLARA)平台。CLARA 是一个全面的基于网络的系统,可以简化研究管理任务,如提交、审查和批准,供调查员和不同的审查委员会在单一的集成平台上使用。CLARA 不仅帮助调查员满足监管要求,还提供了用于管理其他临床研究活动的工具,包括预算、合同和参与者日程安排计划。

相似文献

1
CLARA: an integrated clinical research administration system.CLARA:一个集成的临床研究管理系统。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct;21(e2):e369-73. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002616. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
2
Introducing a Research Management System to Speed Up and Streamline Clinical Research Activities.引入研究管理系统以加速和简化临床研究活动。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Jul 4;262:63-66. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190017.
3
Working with the institutional review board.与机构审查委员会合作。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jan 15;66(2):176-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070066.
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
5
Effects of Regulatory Support Services on Institutional Review Board Turnaround Times.监管支持服务对机构审查委员会周转时间的影响。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Jul;12(3):131-139. doi: 10.1177/1556264617704294. Epub 2017 Apr 16.
6
Clinical research regulation: challenges to the institutional review board system.临床研究监管:机构审查委员会制度面临的挑战
Clin Dermatol. 2009 Jul-Aug;27(4):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.02.012.
7
Regulatory Support Improves Subsequent IRB Approval Rates in Studies Initially Deemed Not Ready for Review: A CTSA Institution's Experience.监管支持提高了最初被认为未准备好进行审查的研究的后续机构审查委员会批准率:一个临床与转化科学奖机构的经验。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Apr;13(2):139-144. doi: 10.1177/1556264617752725. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
8
Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance.过渡到美国国立卫生研究院单一机构审查委员会模式:试用简化、多地点、加速试验 IRB 资源依赖的方法。
Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):290-296. doi: 10.1177/1740774519832911. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
9
Effects of local institutional review board review on participation in national practice-based research network studies.当地机构审查委员会审查对参与全国基于实践的研究网络研究的影响。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Dec;163(12):1130-4. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.206.
10
Integrating a Federated Healthcare Data Query Platform With Electronic IRB Information Systems.将联合医疗数据查询平台与电子机构审查委员会信息系统集成。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:291-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Informatics infrastructure in a rural pediatric clinical trials network: Matching specific clinical research needs with best practices and industry guidelines.农村儿科临床试验网络中的信息学基础设施:将特定的临床研究需求与最佳实践和行业指南相匹配。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Mar;126:107110. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107110. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Design and implementation of an integrated data model to support clinical and translational research administration.设计并实现一个综合数据模型以支持临床和转化研究管理。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;29(9):1559-1566. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac100.
3
Research Integrated Network of Systems (RINS): a virtual data warehouse for the acceleration of translational research.研究集成网络系统(RINS):一个虚拟数据仓库,用于加速转化研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1440-1450. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab023.
4
Reducing the Single IRB Burden: Streamlining Electronic IRB Systems.减少单一 IRB 负担:简化电子 IRB 系统。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):33-40. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1818877. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
5
The IRB structure and medical research reform.机构审查委员会的结构与医学研究改革。
Clin Transl Med. 2018 Apr 2;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40169-018-0188-3.
6
IRB Process Improvements: A Machine Learning Analysis.机构审查委员会流程改进:机器学习分析
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Jun;1(3):176-183. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.25. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
7
Real-Time Enrollment Dashboard For Multisite Clinical Trials.多中心临床试验的实时入组仪表盘
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2015 Oct 30;1:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2015.09.001.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research.机构审查委员会实践差异对观察性卫生服务研究的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Feb;41(1):214-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00458.x.
2
Variation in Institutional Review processes for a multisite observational study.一项多中心观察性研究中机构审查流程的差异
Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):805-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.024.