Chandurkar Anshu M, Metgud Sandeep S, Yakub Shaikh Shoeb, Kalburge Vaishali J, Biradar Basawaraj C
Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rural Dental College , Pravara Medical Trust, India .
Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pacific Dental College , Udaipur, Rajasthan, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Mar;8(3):221-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7463.4167. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of light intensity and curing cycles of QTH and LED lights on the microleakage of Class V composite restorations.
Eighty freshly extracted human maxillary premolars were used for this study. Standardized Class V cavities were prepared and they were restored with microhybrid resin composite. According to the curing protocol, the teeth were then divided into 4 groups (n=20): QTH curing (standard and soft start modes), and LED (standard and soft start modes) irradiations. Microleakage was evaluated by immersion of the samples in 50% silver nitrate solution. The samples were then sectioned, evaluated under a stereomicroscope, and scored for microleakage.
The results of the present in-vitro study showed mean dye leakage scores of 1.9, 1.2, 1.45 and 0.90 for Group I (QTH-Standard mode), Group II (QTH-Soft Start mode), Group III (LED-Standard mode) and Group IV (LED-Soft Start mode) respectively.
It was thus concluded that the soft start polymerization showed a highly significant difference as compared to the standard curing modes of QTH and LED lights, respectively.
本研究的目的是评估石英卤钨灯(QTH)和发光二极管(LED)灯的光强度及固化周期对Ⅴ类复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。
本研究使用80颗新鲜拔除的人类上颌前磨牙。制备标准化的Ⅴ类窝洞,并用微混合树脂复合材料进行修复。根据固化方案,将牙齿分为4组(n = 20):QTH固化(标准模式和软启动模式)以及LED(标准模式和软启动模式)照射。通过将样本浸入50%硝酸银溶液中来评估微渗漏情况。然后将样本切片,在体视显微镜下进行评估,并对微渗漏进行评分。
本体外研究结果显示,第Ⅰ组(QTH - 标准模式)、第Ⅱ组(QTH - 软启动模式)、第Ⅲ组(LED - 标准模式)和第Ⅳ组(LED - 软启动模式)的平均染料渗漏评分分别为1.9、1.2、1.45和0.90。
因此得出结论,与QTH和LED灯的标准固化模式相比,软启动聚合分别显示出高度显著的差异。