Ma J K, Hunjan M, Smith R, Lehner T
Department of Immunology, United Medical School, Guy's Hospital, London, England.
Clin Exp Immunol. 1989 Sep;77(3):331-7.
Local oral passive immunization in human subjects with a monoclonal antibody (MoAb) raised against the 185-kD antigen I/II from S. mutans significantly reduced or prevented oral colonization of an exogenous strain of the organism. In subjects sham-immunized with either saline or an unrelated MoAb, however, significantly greater proportions of S. mutans persisted for a longer duration than in those immunized with the specific anti-streptococcal MoAb. Recolonization of indigenous S. mutans after this organism was reduced to undetectable levels by an antimicrobial agent has also been completely prevented with specific MoAb. Indeed, S. mutans was not detected for a period of over 1 year, as compared with recolonization within 10-82 days in the control subjects. The specificity of MoAb in preventing colonization of the streptococci was studied with four MoAb. This revealed that: (1) the sub-class of antibody is not an essential factor, as both MoAb Guy's 1 and 13 prevented colonization, although Guy's 1 is an IgG2a and Guy's 13 is an IgG1 class of antibody; (2) serotype specificity is important, as MoAb Guy's 9, which only recognizes S. sobrinus (serotypes d and g), does not prevent colonisation by S. mutans (serotype c); (3) neither protein nor carbohydrate nature of the putative adhesin was a determining factor, because MoAb Guy's 1 recognizes a carbohydrate and Guy's 13 a protein determinant and both MoAb prevented adherence of S. mutans; and (4) epitope specificity appears to be the most important factor in preventing adherence of S. mutans, as MoAb Guy's 11 and 13 share the same serotype specificity and both recognize a protein determinant, yet only Guy's 13 prevents colonisation. The long duration of protection from re-colonization by indigenous S. mutans, lasting about 1 year after application of the specific MoAb was stopped, cannot be accounted for by functional MoAb remaining on the teeth. We suggest that initially the MoAb prevents colonization by S. mutans and that the ecological niche vacated by this streptococcus is filled by other organisms from the oral flora, thereby discouraging re-colonization by S. mutans.
用针对变形链球菌185-kD抗原I/II产生的单克隆抗体(MoAb)对人体受试者进行局部口腔被动免疫,可显著减少或防止该生物体的外源性菌株在口腔中定植。然而,在用盐水或无关单克隆抗体进行假免疫的受试者中,与用特异性抗链球菌单克隆抗体免疫的受试者相比,变形链球菌持续存在的比例显著更高,持续时间更长。在用抗菌剂将本土变形链球菌减少到检测不到的水平后,用特异性单克隆抗体也完全防止了其重新定植。事实上,在超过1年的时间里都未检测到变形链球菌,而在对照受试者中,10 - 82天内就重新定植了。用四种单克隆抗体研究了单克隆抗体在防止链球菌定植方面的特异性。结果表明:(1)抗体的亚类不是一个关键因素,因为单克隆抗体Guy's 1和13都能防止定植,尽管Guy's 1是IgG2a类抗体,Guy's 13是IgG1类抗体;(2)血清型特异性很重要,因为仅识别远缘链球菌(血清型d和g)的单克隆抗体Guy's 9不能防止变形链球菌(血清型c)的定植;(3)假定黏附素的蛋白质或碳水化合物性质都不是决定因素,因为单克隆抗体Guy's 1识别碳水化合物,Guy's 13识别蛋白质决定簇,且两种单克隆抗体都能防止变形链球菌的黏附;(4)表位特异性似乎是防止变形链球菌黏附的最重要因素,因为单克隆抗体Guy's 11和13具有相同的血清型特异性,且都识别蛋白质决定簇,但只有Guy's 13能防止定植。在用特异性单克隆抗体停止应用后,对本土变形链球菌重新定植的保护作用持续约1年,这不能用残留在牙齿上的功能性单克隆抗体来解释。我们认为,最初单克隆抗体可防止变形链球菌定植,而这种链球菌腾出的生态位被口腔菌群中的其他生物体占据,从而抑制了变形链球菌的重新定植。