Center for Research on Adolescent Health and Development, Public Health Institute, Oakland.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Jun;46(2):63-72. doi: 10.1363/46e1114. Epub 2014 May 1.
Although a rights-based approach to sexuality education has been increasingly discussed in the past decade, documented consensus regarding the goals, concepts and underlying assumptions of this approach is lacking. Differences in the assumed meaning of a rights-based approach can limit discussions of its implementation and evaluation, and impede opportunities to explore and critique a new model for sexuality education.
In-depth interviews were conducted in 2012 with 21 U.S. and international sexuality education experts. Data were thematically coded and analyzed using an iterative approach. Responses were compared according to respondents' professional discipline and geographic focus.
A rights-based approach can be defined as the intersection of four elements: an underlying principle that youth have sexual rights; an expansion of programmatic goals beyond reducing unintended pregnancy and STDs; a broadening of curricula content to include such issues as gender norms, sexual orientation, sexual expression and pleasure, violence, and individual rights and responsibilities in relationships; and a participatory teaching strategy that engages youth in critical thinking about their sexuality and sexual choices. These elements were consistently identified by respondents across professional disciplines and geographic foci. In addition, all respondents raised questions about the feasibility of implementing a rights-based approach, particularly in the United States.
While questions remain to be answered regarding the implementation and impact of rights-based sexuality education, the proposed conceptual definition suggests multiple avenues for advocates, researchers, program developers and funders to enhance adolescent sexual health.
尽管过去十年中,人们越来越多地讨论基于权利的性教育方法,但缺乏关于该方法目标、概念和基本假设的有文件记录的共识。对基于权利的方法的假设含义的差异可能会限制对其实施和评估的讨论,并阻碍探索和批评新的性教育模式的机会。
2012 年,对 21 名美国和国际性教育专家进行了深入访谈。使用迭代方法对数据进行主题编码和分析。根据受访者的专业学科和地理重点对回复进行了比较。
基于权利的方法可以定义为四个要素的交集:青年享有性权利的基本原则;超越减少意外怀孕和性传播疾病的方案目标扩展;将课程内容扩展到包括性别规范、性取向、性表达和性愉悦、暴力以及关系中的个人权利和责任等问题;以及一种参与式教学策略,使青年能够批判性地思考自己的性行为和性选择。这些要素得到了来自不同专业学科和地理重点的受访者的一致认可。此外,所有受访者都对实施基于权利的方法的可行性提出了质疑,特别是在美国。
尽管关于基于权利的性教育的实施和影响仍存在问题,但拟议的概念定义为倡导者、研究人员、方案制定者和资助者提供了多个途径,以加强青少年的性健康。