Suppr超能文献

日本草药葛根汤与一种代表性复方感冒药相比在预防普通感冒病情加重方面无优越性:一项随机对照试验。

Non-superiority of Kakkonto, a Japanese herbal medicine, to a representative multiple cold medicine with respect to anti-aggravation effects on the common cold: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Okabayashi Satoe, Goto Masashi, Kawamura Takashi, Watanabe Hidetsuna, Kimura Akira, Uruma Reiko, Takahashi Yuko, Taneichi Setsuko, Musashi Manabu, Miyaki Koichi

机构信息

Kyoto University Health Service, Japan.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2014;53(9):949-56. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.53.1783. Epub 2014 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Kakkonto, a Japanese herbal medicine, is frequently used to treat the common cold not only with a physician's prescription, but also in self-medication situations. This study aimed to examine whether Kakkonto prevents the aggravation of cold symptoms if taken at an early stage of illness compared with a well-selected Western-style multiple cold medicine.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, active drug-controlled, randomized trial. Adults 18 to 65 years of age who felt a touch of cold symptoms and visited 15 outpatient healthcare facilities within 48 hours of symptoms onset were enrolled. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups: one treated with Kakkonto (Kakkonto Extract-A, 6 g/day) (n=209) and one treated with a Western-style multiple cold medicine (Pabron Gold-A, 3.6 g/day) (n=198) for at most four days. The primary outcome of this study was the aggravation of cold, nasal, throat or bronchial symptoms, scored as moderate or severe and lasting for at least two days within five days after entry into the study.

RESULTS

Among the 410 enrollees, 340 (168 in the Kakkonto group and 172 in the Pabron group) were included in the analyses. The proportion of participants whose colds were aggravated was 22.6% in the Kakkonto group and 25.0% in the Pabron group (p=0.66). The overall severity of the cold symptoms was not significantly different between the groups. No harmful adverse events occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

Kakkonto did not significantly prevent the progression of cold symptoms, even when prescribed at an early stage of the disease.

摘要

目的

葛根汤是一种日本草药,不仅在医生处方下常用于治疗普通感冒,也用于自我药疗。本研究旨在探讨与精心挑选的西药复方感冒药相比,葛根汤在疾病早期服用是否能预防感冒症状加重。

方法

本研究为多中心、活性药物对照、随机试验。纳入18至65岁在症状出现后48小时内感觉有轻微感冒症状并前往15家门诊医疗机构就诊的成年人。参与者被随机分为两组:一组接受葛根汤治疗(葛根汤提取物-A,6克/天)(n = 209),另一组接受西药复方感冒药治疗(帕布洛金-A,3.6克/天)(n = 198),最长治疗四天。本研究的主要结局是感冒、鼻腔、咽喉或支气管症状加重,在进入研究后五天内评分为中度或重度且持续至少两天。

结果

在410名入组者中,340名(葛根汤组168名,帕布洛金组172名)纳入分析。葛根汤组感冒症状加重的参与者比例为22.6%,帕布洛金组为25.0%(p = 0.66)。两组感冒症状的总体严重程度无显著差异。两组均未发生有害不良事件。

结论

即使在疾病早期开出处方,葛根汤也不能显著预防感冒症状的进展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验