Scales Charles D, Saigal Christopher S, Hanley Janet M, Dick Andrew W, Setodji Claude M, Litwin Mark S
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program and US Department of Veterans Affairs; Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Surgery. 2014 May;155(5):769-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.013. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
Unplanned follow-up care is the focus of intense health policy interest, as evidenced by recent financial penalties imposed under the Affordable Care Act. To date, however, unplanned postoperative care remains poorly characterized, particularly for patients with kidney stones. Our objective was to describe the frequency, variation, and financial impact of unplanned, high-acuity, follow-up visits in the treatment of patients with urinary stone disease.
We identified privately insured patients undergoing percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, ureteroscopy, or shock-wave lithotripsy for stone disease. The primary outcome was occurrence of an emergency department visit or hospital admission within 30 days of the procedure. Multivariable models estimated the odds of an unplanned visit and the incremental cost of those visits, controlling for important covariates.
We identified 93,523 initial procedures to fragment or remove stones. Overall, 1 in 7 patients had an unplanned postprocedural visit. Unplanned visits were least common after shock-wave lithotripsy (12%) and occurred with similar frequency after ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (15%). Procedures at high-volume facilities were substantially less likely to result in an unplanned visit (odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.74-0.87, P < .001). When an unplanned visit occurred, adjusted incremental expenditures per episode were greater after shock-wave lithotripsy ($32,156 [95% CI $30,453-33,859]) than after ureteroscopy ($23,436 [95% CI $22,281-24,590]).
Patients not infrequently experience an unplanned, high-acuity visit after low-risk procedures to remove urinary stones, and the cost of these encounters is substantial. Interventions are indicated to identify and reduce preventable unplanned visits.
非计划性随访护理是卫生政策高度关注的焦点,《平价医疗法案》近期实施的经济处罚就证明了这一点。然而,迄今为止,非计划性术后护理的特征仍不明确,尤其是对于肾结石患者。我们的目标是描述非计划性、高急症程度的随访就诊在尿路结石病患者治疗中的频率、差异及经济影响。
我们确定了因结石病接受经皮肾镜取石术、输尿管镜检查或冲击波碎石术的私人保险患者。主要结局是术后30天内急诊就诊或住院情况。多变量模型估计了非计划性就诊的几率以及这些就诊的增量成本,并对重要协变量进行了控制。
我们确定了93523例最初进行结石破碎或清除的手术。总体而言,七分之一的患者术后有非计划性就诊。冲击波碎石术后非计划性就诊最不常见(12%),输尿管镜检查和经皮肾镜取石术后的发生频率相似(15%)。在大容量医疗机构进行的手术导致非计划性就诊的可能性显著降低(比值比0.80,95%置信区间[95%CI]0.74 - 0.87,P <.001)。当发生非计划性就诊时,冲击波碎石术后每次就诊的调整后增量支出(32156美元[95%CI 30453 - 33859美元])高于输尿管镜检查后(23436美元[95%CI 22281 - 24590美元])。
在进行低风险尿路结石清除手术后,患者经常会经历非计划性、高急症程度的就诊,且这些就诊的成本很高。需要采取干预措施来识别并减少可预防的非计划性就诊。