Suppr超能文献

一种量化增强式训练强度的方法学途径。

A Methodological Approach to Quantifying Plyometric Intensity.

作者信息

Jarvis Mark M, Graham-Smith Phil, Comfort Paul

机构信息

1English Institute of Sport, Birmingham, United Kingdom; and 2School of Health, Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, Salford University, Salford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Sep;30(9):2522-32. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000518.

Abstract

Jarvis, MM, Graham-Smith, P, and Comfort, P. A Methodological approach to quantifying plyometric intensity. J Strength Cond Res 30(9): 2522-2532, 2016-In contrast to other methods of training, the quantification of plyometric exercise intensity is poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of a range of neuromuscular and mechanical variables to describe the intensity of plyometric exercises. Seven male recreationally active subjects performed a series of 7 plyometric exercises. Neuromuscular activity was measured using surface electromyography (SEMG) at vastus lateralis (VL) and biceps femoris (BF). Surface electromyography data were divided into concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) phases of movement. Mechanical output was measured by ground reaction forces and processed to provide peak impact ground reaction force (PF), peak eccentric power (PEP), and impulse (IMP). Statistical analysis was conducted to assess the reliability intraclass correlation coefficient and sensitivity smallest detectable difference of all variables. Mean values of SEMG demonstrate high reliability (r ≥ 0.82), excluding ECC VL during a 40-cm drop jump (r = 0.74). PF, PEP, and IMP demonstrated high reliability (r ≥ 0.85). Statistical power for force variables was excellent (power = 1.0), and good for SEMG (power ≥0.86) excluding CON BF (power = 0.57). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in CON SEMG between exercises. Eccentric phase SEMG only distinguished between exercises involving a landing and those that did not (percentage of maximal voluntary isometric contraction [%MVIC] = no landing -65 ± 5, landing -140 ± 8). Peak eccentric power, PF, and IMP all distinguished between exercises. In conclusion, CON neuromuscular activity does not appear to vary when intent is maximal, whereas ECC activity is dependent on the presence of a landing. Force characteristics provide a reliable and sensitive measure enabling precise description of intensity in plyometric exercises. The present findings provide coaches and scientists with an insightful and precise method of measuring intensity in plyometrics, which will allow for greater control of programming variables.

摘要

贾维斯、M.M.,格雷厄姆-史密斯、P.,以及康福特、P. 一种量化增强式训练强度的方法学途径。《力量与体能研究杂志》30(9): 2522 - 2532,2016年。与其他训练方法不同,增强式训练强度的量化定义不明确。本研究的目的是评估一系列神经肌肉和力学变量用于描述增强式训练强度的适用性。七名男性休闲活跃受试者进行了一系列七项增强式训练。使用表面肌电图(SEMG)在股外侧肌(VL)和股二头肌(BF)处测量神经肌肉活动。表面肌电图数据被分为运动的向心(CON)和离心(ECC)阶段。通过地面反作用力测量力学输出,并进行处理以提供峰值冲击地面反作用力(PF)、峰值离心功率(PEP)和冲量(IMP)。进行统计分析以评估所有变量的可靠性组内相关系数和敏感性最小可检测差异。SEMG的平均值显示出高可靠性(r≥0.82),40厘米下落跳期间股外侧肌离心阶段(ECC VL)除外(r = 0.74)。PF、PEP和IMP显示出高可靠性(r≥0.85)。力量变量的统计功效极佳(功效 = 1.0),SEMG的功效良好(功效≥0.86),股二头肌向心阶段(CON BF)除外(功效 = 0.57)。训练之间向心阶段SEMG无显著差异(p > 0.05)。离心阶段SEMG仅能区分涉及落地的训练和不涉及落地的训练(最大自主等长收缩百分比[%MVIC] = 不落地 - 65±5,落地 - 140±8)。峰值离心功率、PF和IMP均能区分不同训练。总之,当意图达到最大时,向心神经肌肉活动似乎没有变化,而离心活动取决于是否有落地。力量特征提供了一种可靠且敏感的测量方法,能够精确描述增强式训练的强度。本研究结果为教练和科研人员提供了一种洞察性强且精确的测量增强式训练强度的方法,这将有助于更好地控制训练计划变量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验