Damianos John A, Matar Ayah, Halawi Houssam
Mayo Clinic Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025 May 1;27(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s11894-025-00977-5.
Breath testing to diagnose intestinal microbial overgrowth (MO) is being increasingly utilized, in part due to direct-to-consumer testing modalities. However, the concept of breath testing in the diagnosis of MO is controversial due to numerous limitations regarding optimal substrate, diagnostic thresholds, and confounding variables. We provide seven real-world cases which comprehensively illustrate the principles and nuances of the interpretation of breath testing.
We highlight recent studies which examine the optimal substrate for breath testing (glucose versus lactulose), the subtypes and clinical significance of breath test patterns including hydrogen, methane, and hydrogen-sulfide, elevated baseline gas levels, and confounders to breath test interpretation including transit time and diet. Reviewing the latest evidence, we provide recommendations for a personalized interpretation of breath tests utilizing unique patient factors. We conclude with an algorithm to assist clinicians in providing more accurate diagnoses.
呼气试验用于诊断肠道微生物过度生长(MO)的应用日益广泛,部分原因是直接面向消费者的检测方式。然而,由于在最佳底物、诊断阈值和混杂变量方面存在诸多限制,呼气试验在MO诊断中的概念存在争议。我们提供了七个实际病例,全面阐述了呼气试验解读的原则和细微差别。
我们重点介绍了近期的研究,这些研究探讨了呼气试验的最佳底物(葡萄糖与乳果糖)、呼气试验模式的亚型及临床意义,包括氢气、甲烷和硫化氢、基线气体水平升高,以及呼气试验解读的混杂因素,包括转运时间和饮食。通过回顾最新证据,我们利用患者的独特因素为呼气试验的个性化解读提供建议。我们最后给出了一个算法,以帮助临床医生做出更准确的诊断。