Thompson Stephen R, Delaney Geoff P, Gabriel Gabriel S, Barton Michael B
Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CCORE), Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia ; University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2014 Mar;6(1):28-32. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2014.42022. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
We previously conducted modelling and a patterns of care study (POCS) that showed gynaecological brachytherapy (BT) was underutilized in New South Wales (NSW), the USA and Western Europe. The aim of the current study was to assess the quality of cervical BT in NSW, and to determine if caseload affects quality of treatment delivery.
All nine NSW radiation oncology departments that treated patients with cervical BT in 2003 were visited. Patient, tumour and treatment related data were collected. Quality of BT was assessed using published quality benchmarks. Higher and lower caseload departments were compared.
The four higher cervical BT caseload departments treated 11-15 NSW residents in 2003, compared to 1-8 patients for the lower caseload departments. Cervix cancer patients treated at the higher caseload departments were more likely to be treated to a point A dose ≥ 80 Gy (58% vs. 14%, p = 0.001), and to have treatment completed within 8 weeks (66% vs. 35%, p = 0.02). Despite higher point A doses, there was no significant difference in proportions achieving lower than recommended rectal or bladder doses, implying better BT insertions in higher caseload departments.
Cervical BT in NSW was dispersed amongst a large number of departments and was frequently of sub-optimal quality. Higher quality BT was achieved in departments treating at least 10 patients per year. It is likely that improved outcomes will be achievable if at least 10 patients are treated per department per year.
我们之前进行了建模和护理模式研究(POCS),结果显示新南威尔士州(NSW)、美国和西欧的妇科近距离放射治疗(BT)未得到充分利用。本研究的目的是评估新南威尔士州宫颈BT的质量,并确定病例数量是否会影响治疗实施的质量。
走访了2003年所有为宫颈BT患者提供治疗的新南威尔士州9个放射肿瘤学科室。收集了患者、肿瘤和治疗相关数据。使用已发表的质量基准评估BT质量。比较了病例数量较多和较少的科室。
2003年,病例数量较多的四个宫颈BT科室治疗了11 - 15名新南威尔士州居民,而病例数量较少的科室治疗了1 - 8名患者。在病例数量较多的科室接受治疗的宫颈癌患者更有可能接受A点剂量≥80 Gy的治疗(58%对14%,p = 0.001),并且更有可能在8周内完成治疗(66%对35%,p = 0.02)。尽管A点剂量较高,但在达到低于推荐的直肠或膀胱剂量的比例方面没有显著差异,这意味着病例数量较多的科室的BT植入更好。
新南威尔士州的宫颈BT分散在大量科室中,质量常常不理想。每年治疗至少10名患者的科室能实现更高质量的BT。如果每个科室每年治疗至少10名患者,很可能会取得更好的治疗效果。