Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的当日出院或过夜留院:净不良心血管事件的比较

Same-day discharge or overnight stay after percutaneous coronary intervention: comparison of net adverse cardiovascular events.

作者信息

Nascimento Francisco O, Pineda Andres M, Benjo Alexandre, Mas Ildefonso, Podesta Carlos, Heimowitz Todd B, Kirtane Ajay, Beohar Nirat

机构信息

Columbia University, Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Heart Institute, 4300 Alton Road, Miami Beach, FL 33140 USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 May;26(5):204-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), if achieved with acceptable safety, could result in greater patient satisfaction and potential cost savings. Comparative analyses reporting the safety outcomes of same-day discharge vs overnight stay after elective PCI are lacking.

METHODS

Data of same-day discharge and overnight-stay patients undergoing elective PCI in a high-volume center were compared. We specifically evaluated the incidence of net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE; i.e., death, myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization, vascular complication, and major bleeding) within 48 hours post index procedure among both groups and at 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 188 cases were evaluated, with 93 discharged the same day and 95 after overnight stay following elective PCI. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for older age (73.0 ± 7 years vs. 64.0 ± 12 years; P<.001), more prior PCI (49.5% vs. 34.7%; P<.001), and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (16.1% vs. 11.6%; P=.01) in the same-day discharge group. Procedural characteristics were similar in both groups. No significant difference in the NACE rate was found between the groups at 48 hours (0 [0%] vs. 2 [2.1%]; P=.25) or at 30 days (3 [3.2%] vs. 6 [6.3%]; P=.26).

CONCLUSION

In the population studied, same-day discharge after PCI is safe and feasible. Adequately powered randomized prospective studies are necessary to confirm these results.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后当日出院,若能确保可接受的安全性,则可提高患者满意度并可能节省成本。目前缺乏关于择期PCI后当日出院与过夜留院安全性结果的比较分析。

方法

比较了一家大型中心接受择期PCI的当日出院患者和过夜留院患者的数据。我们特别评估了两组患者在首次手术后48小时内及30天时的净不良心血管事件(NACE,即死亡、心肌梗死、中风、靶血管血运重建、血管并发症和大出血)发生率。

结果

共评估了188例病例,其中93例在择期PCI后当日出院,95例过夜留院。除当日出院组年龄较大(73.0±7岁 vs. 64.0±12岁;P<0.001)、既往PCI史更多(49.5% vs. 34.7%;P<0.001)和既往冠状动脉旁路移植手术史(16.1% vs. 11.6%;P=0.01)外,两组的基线特征相似。两组的手术特征相似。两组在48小时时(0 [0%] vs. 2 [2.1%];P=0.25)或30天时(3 [3.2%] vs. 6 [6.3%];P=0.26)的NACE发生率无显著差异。

结论

在所研究的人群中,PCI后当日出院是安全可行的。需要进行足够样本量的随机前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验