Bundhun Pravesh Kumar, Soogund Mohammad Zafooruddin Sani, Huang Wei-Qiang
Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, P. R. China.
Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, P. R. China.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169807. eCollection 2017.
New research in interventional cardiology has shown the demand for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) to have increased tremendously. Effective treatment with a lower hospital cost has been the aim of several PCI capable centers. This study aimed to compare the adverse clinical outcomes associated with same day discharge versus overnight stay in the hospital following PCI in a population of randomized patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed), the Cochrane Registry of Randomized Controlled Trials and EMBASE databases were searched (from March to June 2016) for randomized trials comparing same-day discharge versus overnight stay in the hospital following PCI. Main endpoints in this analysis included adverse cardiovascular outcomes observed during a 30-day period. Statistical analysis was carried out by the RevMan 5.3 software whereby odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with respect to a fixed or a random effects model.
Eight randomized trials with a total number of 3081 patients (1598 patients who were discharged on the same day and 1483 patients who stayed overnight in the hospital) were included. Results of this analysis showed that mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were not significantly different between same day discharge versus overnight stay following PCI with OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.04-1.35; P = 0.10, OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.33-1.41; P = 0.30 and OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.20-1.02; P = 0.06 respectively. Blood transfusion and re-hospitalization were also not significantly different between these two groups with OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.13-3.21; P = 0.59 and OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 0.88-2.65; P = 0.13 respectively. Similarly, any adverse event, major bleeding and repeated revascularization were also not significantly different between these two groups of patients with stable CAD, with OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.05-3.97; P = 0.45, OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.15-3.54; P = 0.69 and OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.14-3.15; P = 0.61 respectively.
In terms of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, same day discharge was neither superior nor inferior to overnight hospital stay following PCI in those patients with stable CAD. However, future research will have to emphasize on the long-term consequences.
介入心脏病学的新研究表明,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的需求大幅增加。以较低的医院成本进行有效治疗一直是多个具备PCI能力的中心的目标。本研究旨在比较在患有稳定冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的随机患者群体中,PCI术后当日出院与住院过夜相关的不良临床结局。
检索了美国国立医学图书馆(MEDLINE/PubMed)、Cochrane随机对照试验注册库和EMBASE数据库(2016年3月至6月),以查找比较PCI术后当日出院与住院过夜的随机试验。该分析的主要终点包括在30天内观察到的不良心血管结局。使用RevMan 5.3软件进行统计分析,据此针对固定或随机效应模型计算比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
纳入了8项随机试验,共有3081例患者(1598例当日出院患者和1483例住院过夜患者)。该分析结果显示,PCI术后当日出院与住院过夜相比,死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)无显著差异,OR分别为:0.22,95%CI:0.04 - 1.35;P = 0.10;OR:0.68,95%CI:0.33 - 1.41;P = 0.30;OR:0.45,95%CI:0.20 - 1.02;P = 0.06。两组之间的输血和再次住院情况也无显著差异,OR分别为:0.64,95%CI:0.13 - 3.21;P = 0.59;OR:1.53,95%CI:0.88 - 2.65;P = 0.13。同样,在这两组稳定CAD患者中,任何不良事件、大出血和重复血运重建也无显著差异,OR分别为:0.42,95%CI:0.05 - 3.97;P = 0.45;OR:0.73,95%CI:0.15 - 3.54;P = 0.69;OR:0.67,95%CI:0.14 - 3.15;P = 0.61。
就不良心血管结局而言,在那些稳定CAD患者中,PCI术后当日出院并不优于也不劣于住院过夜。然而,未来的研究将不得不强调长期后果。