Suppr超能文献

给獾(欧洲獾)口服接种抗结核病疫苗:卡介苗巴斯德菌株和丹麦菌株所产生的保护作用比较。

Oral vaccination of badgers (Meles meles) against tuberculosis: comparison of the protection generated by BCG vaccine strains Pasteur and Danish.

作者信息

Murphy Denise, Costello Eamon, Aldwell Frank E, Lesellier Sandrine, Chambers Mark A, Fitzsimons Tara, Corner Leigh A L, Gormley Eamonn

机构信息

School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin 4, Ireland.

Central Veterinary Research Laboratory, Backweston, Celbridge, Co. Kildare, Ireland.

出版信息

Vet J. 2014 Jun;200(3):362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.02.031. Epub 2014 May 1.

Abstract

Vaccination of badgers by the subcutaneous, mucosal and oral routes with the Pasteur strain of Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has resulted in significant protection against experimental infection with virulent M. bovis. However, as the BCG Danish strain is the only commercially licensed BCG vaccine for use in humans in the European Union it is the vaccine of choice for delivery to badger populations. As all oral vaccination studies in badgers were previously conducted using the BCG Pasteur strain, this study compared protection in badgers following oral vaccination with the Pasteur and the Danish strains. Groups of badgers were vaccinated orally with 10(8) colony forming units (CFU) BCG Danish 1331 (n = 7 badgers) or 10(8) CFU BCG Pasteur 1173P2 (n = 6). Another group (n = 8) served as non-vaccinated controls. At 12 weeks post-vaccination, the animals were challenged by the endobronchial route with 6 × 10(3) CFU M. bovis, and at 15 weeks post-infection, all of the badgers were euthanased. Vaccination with either BCG strain provided protection against challenge compared with controls. The vaccinated badgers had significantly fewer sites with gross pathology and significantly lower gross pathological severity scores, fewer sites with histological lesions and fewer sites of infection, significantly lower bacterial counts in the thoracic lymph node, and lower bacterial counts in the lungs than the control group. No differences were observed between either of the vaccine groups by any of the pathology and bacteriology measures. The ELISPOT analysis, measuring production of badger interferon - gamma (IFN-γ), was also similar across the vaccinated groups.

摘要

用卡介苗(BCG)巴斯德菌株通过皮下、黏膜和口服途径给獾接种疫苗,已使其对强毒牛分枝杆菌的实验性感染产生显著保护作用。然而,由于BCG丹麦菌株是欧盟唯一获得商业许可用于人类的BCG疫苗,它是给獾群接种疫苗的首选。由于之前所有针对獾的口服疫苗接种研究均使用BCG巴斯德菌株,本研究比较了用巴斯德菌株和丹麦菌株口服接种疫苗后獾的保护情况。给几组獾分别口服10⁸菌落形成单位(CFU)的BCG丹麦1331(n = 7只獾)或10⁸CFU的BCG巴斯德1173P2(n = 6只)。另一组(n = 8只)作为未接种疫苗的对照。接种疫苗12周后,通过支气管内途径用6×10³CFU牛分枝杆菌对动物进行攻击,感染15周后,对所有獾实施安乐死。与对照组相比,用任何一种BCG菌株接种疫苗均提供了针对攻击的保护。接种疫苗的獾出现大体病理变化的部位显著更少,大体病理严重程度评分显著更低,出现组织学病变的部位更少,感染部位更少,胸段淋巴结中的细菌计数显著更低,肺部细菌计数也低于对照组。在任何病理和细菌学指标方面,两个疫苗组之间均未观察到差异。测量獾γ干扰素(IFN - γ)产生的ELISPOT分析在各接种组中也相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验