Grindstaff Terry L, Pietrosimone Brian G, Sauer Lindsay D, Kerrigan D Casey, Patrie James T, Hertel Jay, Ingersoll Christopher D
School of Pharmacy & Health Professions, Physical Therapy Department, 2500 California Plaza, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Man Ther. 2014 Aug;19(4):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
Manual therapies, directed to the knee and lumbopelvic region, have demonstrated the ability to improve neuromuscular quadriceps function in individuals with knee pathology. It remains unknown if manual therapies may alter impaired spinal reflex excitability, thus identifying a potential mechanism in which manual therapy may improve neuromuscular function following knee injury.
To determine the effect of local and distant mobilisation/manipulation interventions on quadriceps spinal reflex excitability.
Seventy-five individuals with a history of knee joint injury and current quadriceps inhibition volunteered for this study. Participants were randomised to one of five intervention groups: lumbopelvic manipulation (grade V), lumbopelvic manipulation positioning (no thrust), grade IV patellar mobilisation, grade I patellar mobilisation, and control (no treatment). Changes in spinal reflex excitability were quantified by assessing the Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex), presynaptic, and postsynaptic excitability. A hierarchical linear-mixed model for repeated measures was performed to compare changes in outcome variables between groups over time (pre, post 0, 30, 60, 90 min).
There were no significant differences in H-reflex, presynaptic, or postsynaptic excitability between groups across time.
Manual therapies directed to the knee or lumbopelvic region did not acutely change quadriceps spinal reflex excitability. Although manual therapies may improve impairments and functional outcomes the underlying mechanism does not appear to be related to changes in spinal reflex excitability.
针对膝关节和腰骶部区域的手法治疗,已证明能够改善患有膝关节病变个体的神经肌肉股四头肌功能。目前尚不清楚手法治疗是否会改变受损的脊髓反射兴奋性,从而确定手法治疗可能改善膝关节损伤后神经肌肉功能的潜在机制。
确定局部和远距离松动/整复干预对股四头肌脊髓反射兴奋性的影响。
75名有膝关节损伤史且目前股四头肌抑制的个体自愿参加本研究。参与者被随机分配到五个干预组之一:腰骶部整复(V级)、腰骶部整复定位(无推力)、IV级髌骨松动、I级髌骨松动和对照组(不治疗)。通过评估霍夫曼反射(H反射)、突触前和突触后兴奋性来量化脊髓反射兴奋性的变化。采用重复测量的分层线性混合模型来比较组间随时间(术前、术后0、30、60、90分钟)结果变量的变化。
各时间点组间H反射、突触前或突触后兴奋性均无显著差异。
针对膝关节或腰骶部区域的手法治疗并未急性改变股四头肌脊髓反射兴奋性。尽管手法治疗可能改善功能障碍和功能结果,但其潜在机制似乎与脊髓反射兴奋性的变化无关。