Curtin Water Quality Research Centre, Department of Chemistry, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley 6102, Perth, Australia.
Curtin Water Quality Research Centre, Department of Chemistry, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley 6102, Perth, Australia.
Water Res. 2014 Aug 1;59:90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
The formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs) is a public health concern due to their potential adverse health effects. Robust and sensitive methods for the analysis of DBPs, as well as appropriate sample handling procedures, are essential to obtain accurate, precise and reliable data on DBP occurrence and formation. In particular, the use of an appropriate quenching agent is critical to prevent further formation of DBPs during the holding time between sample collection and analysis. Despite reports of decomposition of DBPs caused by some quenching agents, particularly sulphite and thiosulphate, a survey of the literature shows that they are still the most commonly used quenching agents in analysis of DBPs. This study investigated the effects of five quenching agents (sodium sulphite, sodium arsenite, sodium borohydride, ascorbic acid, and ammonium chloride) on the stability of seven different classes of DBPs commonly found in drinking waters, in order to determine the most appropriate quenching agent for the different classes of DBPs. All of the quenching agents tested did not adversely affect the concentrations of trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs), and thus are suitable for quenching of disinfectant residual prior to analysis of these DBPs. Ascorbic acid was found to be suitable for the analysis of haloacetonitriles (HANs) and haloketones (HKs), but should not be used for the analysis of chlorite. Sodium arsenite, sodium borohydride, and ascorbic acid were all acceptable for the analysis of haloacetaldehydes (HALs). All of the quenching agents tested adversely affected the concentration of chloropicrin. A 'universal' quenching agent, suitable for all groups of DBPs studied, was not identified. However, based on the results of this study, we recommend the use of ascorbic acid for quenching of samples to be analysed for organic DBPs (i.e. THMs, HAAs, HANs, HKs, and HALs) and sodium sulphite for analysis of inorganic DBPs. Our study is the first comprehensive study on the effects of quenching agents on the stability of DBPs involving a wide range of DBP classes and quenching agents.
消毒副产物(DBPs)的形成是一个公共卫生关注点,因为它们可能对健康造成不良影响。为了获得关于 DBP 发生和形成的准确、精确和可靠数据,必须使用强大且灵敏的方法来分析 DBPs,并采取适当的样品处理程序。特别是,在样品采集和分析之间的保持时间内,使用适当的猝灭剂对于防止 DBP 的进一步形成至关重要。尽管有报道称一些猝灭剂(特别是亚硫酸盐和硫代硫酸盐)会导致 DBPs 分解,但文献综述表明,它们仍然是分析 DBPs 中最常用的猝灭剂。本研究调查了五种猝灭剂(亚硫酸钠、亚砷酸钠、硼氢化钠、抗坏血酸和氯化铵)对七种不同类型的饮用水中常见的 DBPs 的稳定性的影响,以确定最适合不同类型 DBPs 的猝灭剂。所有测试的猝灭剂均未对三卤甲烷(THMs)和卤乙酸(HAAs)的浓度产生不利影响,因此适用于在分析这些 DBPs 之前猝灭消毒剂残留。发现抗坏血酸适用于卤乙腈(HANs)和卤酮(HKs)的分析,但不适用于亚氯酸盐的分析。亚砷酸钠、硼氢化钠和抗坏血酸均适用于卤乙醛(HALs)的分析。所有测试的猝灭剂均对氯仿的浓度产生不利影响。未鉴定出适用于研究的所有 DBP 组的“通用”猝灭剂。然而,根据本研究的结果,我们建议使用抗坏血酸猝灭要分析的有机 DBPs(即 THMs、HAAs、HANs、HKs 和 HALs)的样品,以及亚硫酸钠分析无机 DBPs。我们的研究是第一项涉及广泛的 DBP 类别和猝灭剂的关于猝灭剂对 DBPs 稳定性影响的综合研究。