Gerritsen Cory J, Toplak Maggie E, Sciaraffa Jessica, Eastwood John
Department of Psychology, York University, Canada.
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Jul;27:27-41. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.001. Epub 2014 May 4.
A variety of causes of boredom have been proposed including environmental, motivational, emotional, and cognitive factors. Here, we explore four potential cognitive causes of boredom: inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, and executive dysfunction. Specifically, we examine the unique and common associations between these factors and boredom propensity. Recent research has established that the two most commonly used measures of boredom propensity (BPS and BSS) are not measuring the same underlying construct. Thus, a second goal of the present project is to determine the unique and common roles of inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity and poor executive system functioning in predicting the BPS and BSS specifically. The findings reveal that inattention, hyperactivity and executive dysfunction predict boredom propensity, with shared variance accounting for the greater part of this effect. Further, executive dysfunction and hyperactivity uniquely predict boredom propensity as measured by the BPS and BSS, respectively.
人们提出了多种导致无聊情绪的原因,包括环境、动机、情绪和认知因素。在此,我们探究无聊情绪的四种潜在认知原因:注意力不集中、多动、冲动及执行功能障碍。具体而言,我们研究这些因素与无聊倾向之间的独特关联及共同关联。近期研究表明,两种最常用的无聊倾向测量方法(无聊倾向量表和无聊敏感性量表)所测量的并非同一潜在结构。因此,本项目的第二个目标是确定注意力不集中、多动、冲动及执行系统功能不佳在分别预测无聊倾向量表和无聊敏感性量表方面的独特作用及共同作用。研究结果显示,注意力不集中、多动和执行功能障碍可预测无聊倾向,其中共享方差在这种影响中占较大比例。此外,执行功能障碍和多动分别独特地预测了由无聊倾向量表和无聊敏感性量表所测量的无聊倾向。