Suppr超能文献

青少年过度无聊:高低成就者之间的比较。

Excessive boredom among adolescents: A comparison between low and high achievers.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241671. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Existing research shows that high achievement boredom is correlated with a range of undesirable behavioral and personality variables and that the main antecedents of boredom are being over- or under-challenged. However, merely knowing that students are highly bored, without taking their achievement level into account, might be insufficient for drawing conclusions about students' behavior and personality. We, therefore, investigated if low- vs. high-achieving students who experience strong mathematics boredom show different behaviors and personality traits. The sample consisted of 1,404 German secondary school students (fifth to 10th grade, mean age 12.83 years, 52% female). We used self-report instruments to assess boredom in mathematics, behavioral (social and emotional problems, positive/negative affect, cognitive reappraisal, and expressive suppression), and personality variables (neuroticism and conscientiousness). In comparing highly bored students (more than one SD above M, n = 258) who were low vs. high achievers (as indicated by the math grade, n = 125 / n = 119), results showed that there were no mean level differences across those groups for all variables. In conclusion, our results suggest that high boredom can occur in both low- and high-achieving students and that bored low- and high-achievers show similar behaviors and personality profiles.

摘要

现有研究表明,高成就无聊感与一系列不良行为和个性变量相关,而无聊感的主要前因是过度或不足的挑战。然而,如果仅仅知道学生感到非常无聊,而不考虑他们的成就水平,可能不足以得出关于学生行为和个性的结论。因此,我们调查了经历强烈数学无聊感的低成就和高成就学生是否表现出不同的行为和个性特征。样本由 1404 名德国中学生(五至十年级,平均年龄 12.83 岁,女性占 52%)组成。我们使用自我报告工具评估数学中的无聊感、行为(社交和情绪问题、积极/消极影响、认知重评和表达抑制)和个性变量(神经质和尽责性)。在比较高度无聊的学生(高于平均值一个标准差以上,n = 258)和低成就(由数学成绩表示,n = 125/n = 119)时,结果表明,在所有变量中,两组之间没有平均值差异。总之,我们的结果表明,高成就和低成就的学生都可能会感到高度无聊,而且感到无聊的低成就和高成就学生表现出相似的行为和个性特征。

相似文献

1
Excessive boredom among adolescents: A comparison between low and high achievers.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241671. eCollection 2020.
2
Boredom due to being over- or under-challenged in mathematics: A latent profile analysis.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2024 Sep;94(3):947-958. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12695. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
3
Ability grouping of gifted students: effects on academic self-concept and boredom.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):451-72. doi: 10.1348/000709909X480716. Epub 2010 Jan 16.
4
Boredom begets boredom: An experience sampling study on the impact of teacher boredom on student boredom and motivation.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Jun;90 Suppl 1:124-137. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12309. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
5
Testing the predictors of boredom at school: development and validation of the precursors to boredom scales.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2011 Sep;81(Pt 3):421-40. doi: 10.1348/000709910X526038. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
6
More Bored Today Than Yesterday? National Trends in Adolescent Boredom From 2008 to 2017.
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Mar;66(3):360-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.09.021. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
7
Proneness to Boredom and Risk Behaviors During Adolescents' Free Time.
Psychol Rep. 2018 Apr;121(2):303-323. doi: 10.1177/0033294117724447. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
8
Adolescents' fire-setting awareness under boredom: relation to personality variables.
Psychol Rep. 2004 Jun;94(3 Pt 1):863-71. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.3.863-871.
9
International note: The relationship between achievement goals and academic-related boredom.
J Adolesc. 2015 Jun;41:53-5. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
10
When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: the roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project-based learning.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2008 Jun;78(Pt 2):205-21. doi: 10.1348/000709907X218160. Epub 2007 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

2
The happy learner: Effects of academic boredom, burnout, and engagement.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 10;13:974486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974486. eCollection 2022.
5
Boredom Makes Me Sick: Adolescents' Boredom Trajectories and Their Health-Related Quality of Life.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;18(12):6308. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126308.

本文引用的文献

1
Boring thoughts and bored minds: The MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement.
Psychol Rev. 2018 Oct;125(5):689-713. doi: 10.1037/rev0000097. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
2
Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Tier 2 Type Reading Interventions in Grades K-3.
Educ Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;28(3):551-576. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
5
Validation of the Spanish version of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale (MSBS).
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 May 15;13:59. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0252-2.
6
I can't get no satisfaction: potential causes of boredom.
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Jul;27:27-41. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.001. Epub 2014 May 4.
8
The measurement of boredom: differences between existing self-report scales.
Assessment. 2013 Oct;20(5):585-96. doi: 10.1177/1073191111408229. Epub 2011 May 12.
9
Ability grouping of gifted students: effects on academic self-concept and boredom.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):451-72. doi: 10.1348/000709909X480716. Epub 2010 Jan 16.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验