Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定/芬太尼与咪达唑仑/芬太尼联合用于拔牙术中镇静镇痛的比较。

Comparison of dexmedetomidine/fentanyl with midazolam/fentanyl combination for sedation and analgesia during tooth extraction.

作者信息

Yu C, Li S, Deng F, Yao Y, Qian L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Stomatology Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Anesthesia, Stomatology Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;43(9):1148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 May 1.

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine is an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist that causes minimal respiratory depression compared with alternative drugs. This study investigated whether combined dexmedetomidine/fentanyl offered better sedation and analgesia than midazolam/fentanyl in dental surgery. Sixty patients scheduled for unilateral impacted tooth extraction were randomly assigned to receive either dexmedetomidine and fentanyl (D/F) or midazolam and fentanyl (M/F). Recorded variables were patient preoperative anxiety scores, vital signs, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAAS) scores after drug administration, surgeon and patient degree of satisfaction, and the duration of analgesia after surgery. The OAAS scores were significantly lower for patients administered D/F compared to those who received M/F. The duration of analgesia after the surgical procedure was significantly longer in patients who received D/F (5.3 h) than in those who received M/F (4.1 h; P=0.017). The number of surgeons satisfied with the level of sedation/analgesia provided by D/F was significantly higher than for M/F (P=0.001). Therefore, dexmedetomidine/fentanyl appears to provide better sedation, stable haemodynamics, surgeon satisfaction, and postoperative analgesia than midazolam/fentanyl during office-based unilateral impacted tooth extraction.

摘要

右美托咪定是一种α2肾上腺素能受体激动剂,与其他药物相比,它引起的呼吸抑制最小。本研究调查了在牙科手术中,右美托咪定/芬太尼联合使用是否比咪达唑仑/芬太尼提供更好的镇静和镇痛效果。60例计划进行单侧阻生齿拔除术的患者被随机分配接受右美托咪定和芬太尼(D/F)或咪达唑仑和芬太尼(M/F)。记录的变量包括患者术前焦虑评分、生命体征、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、给药后观察者警觉/镇静量表(OAAS)评分、外科医生和患者的满意度以及术后镇痛持续时间。与接受M/F的患者相比,接受D/F的患者的OAAS评分显著更低。接受D/F的患者手术后的镇痛持续时间(5.3小时)明显长于接受M/F的患者(4.1小时;P = 0.017)。对D/F提供的镇静/镇痛水平感到满意的外科医生数量显著高于M/F(P = 0.001)。因此,在门诊单侧阻生齿拔除术中,右美托咪定/芬太尼似乎比咪达唑仑/芬太尼提供更好的镇静、稳定的血流动力学、外科医生满意度和术后镇痛效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验