Clark Connor, Kalita Jugal
Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA.
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 15;30(16):2351-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu307. Epub 2014 May 2.
As biological inquiry produces ever more network data, such as protein-protein interaction networks, gene regulatory networks and metabolic networks, many algorithms have been proposed for the purpose of pairwise network alignment-finding a mapping from the nodes of one network to the nodes of another in such a way that the mapped nodes can be considered to correspond with respect to both their place in the network topology and their biological attributes. This technique is helpful in identifying previously undiscovered homologies between proteins of different species and revealing functionally similar subnetworks. In the past few years, a wealth of different aligners has been published, but few of them have been compared with one another, and no comprehensive review of these algorithms has yet appeared.
We present the problem of biological network alignment, provide a guide to existing alignment algorithms and comprehensively benchmark existing algorithms on both synthetic and real-world biological data, finding dramatic differences between existing algorithms in the quality of the alignments they produce. Additionally, we find that many of these tools are inconvenient to use in practice, and there remains a need for easy-to-use cross-platform tools for performing network alignment.
随着生物学研究产生越来越多的网络数据,如蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络、基因调控网络和代谢网络,已经提出了许多算法用于成对网络比对——找到从一个网络的节点到另一个网络的节点的映射,使得映射的节点在网络拓扑结构中的位置及其生物学属性方面都能被认为是对应的。这种技术有助于识别不同物种蛋白质之间先前未发现的同源性,并揭示功能相似的子网。在过去几年中,已经发表了大量不同的比对工具,但很少有工具相互比较,并且尚未出现对这些算法的全面综述。
我们提出了生物网络比对问题,为现有的比对算法提供了指南,并在合成和真实世界的生物数据上全面基准测试现有算法,发现现有算法在它们产生的比对质量上存在显著差异。此外,我们发现这些工具中的许多在实际使用中不方便,并且仍然需要易于使用的跨平台工具来进行网络比对。