Suppr超能文献

大脑如何处理刺激-反应冲突?来自偏侧化准备电位头皮地形图和反应时间的新见解。

How the Brain Process Stimulus-Response Conflict? New Insights from Lateralized Readiness Potentials Scalp Topography and Reaction Times.

作者信息

Lavoie Marc E, Stauder Johannes E A

机构信息

Laboratoire de Psychophysiologie Cognitive et Sociale ; Centre de Recherche Fernand-Seguin, de l'hôpital Louis-H. Lafontaine, Montréal, Canada ; Département de Psychiatrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb 27;3(1):150-155. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2013.31014.

Abstract

Stimulus-Response Compatibility (SRC) refers to the fact that some tasks are performed easier and better than others because of the way stimuli and responses are paired with each other. To assess the brain responses to stimulus-response conflicts, we investigated the behavioral (accuracy and Reaction Times: RTs) as well as the physiological response (Lateralized Readiness Potentials: LRP) modulations in a positional blocked and a conditional mixed design in twelve university students. Results revealed that the performance was less accurate and the RTs, as well as the LRP onset, were delayed under the mixed conditional design. A greater compatibility effect was also noted on accuracy, RTs and LRP onset latency in the mixed design. Consistent with these findings, smaller peak activation at fronto-central areas suggests that more selective inhibition is needed in a mixed design context. Despite a smaller activation, the topographical distribution is similar in both designs. These results indicate that the translation time between stimulus- and response codes are greater under the mixed instruction, while the similar LRP topography suggests that common neural structures underlie LRPs in response to both type of designs.

摘要

刺激-反应相容性(SRC)指的是这样一个事实:由于刺激与反应相互配对的方式,一些任务比其他任务执行起来更容易且更好。为了评估大脑对刺激-反应冲突的反应,我们在一个位置块设计和一个条件混合设计中,对12名大学生的行为(准确性和反应时间:RTs)以及生理反应(偏侧化准备电位:LRP)调制进行了研究。结果显示,在混合条件设计下,表现的准确性较低,反应时间以及LRP起始均延迟。在混合设计中,在准确性、反应时间和LRP起始潜伏期方面也观察到了更大的相容性效应。与这些发现一致,额中央区域较小的峰值激活表明在混合设计背景下需要更多的选择性抑制。尽管激活较小,但两种设计中的地形分布相似。这些结果表明,在混合指令下,刺激代码和反应代码之间的转换时间更长,而相似的LRP地形表明,响应两种设计类型的LRP具有共同的神经结构。

相似文献

2
Cognitive-behavioral therapy induces sensorimotor and specific electrocortical changes in chronic tic and Tourette's disorder.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Dec;79(Pt B):310-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 27.
4
Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
Brain Res. 2008 Jan 16;1189:179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.096. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
5
Separating stimulus-driven and response-related LRP components with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE).
Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan;50(1):70-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01479.x. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
6
Proactive and reactive control in S-R compatibility: a brain potential analysis.
Psychophysiology. 2012 Jun;49(6):756-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01368.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
7
Distractor inhibition: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials.
Brain Cogn. 2015 Aug;98:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
10
The neural dynamics of stimulus and response conflict processing as a function of response complexity and task demands.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:14-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.035. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):593-609. doi: 10.1037/a0029923. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
2
Attention and spatial stimulus coding in the Simon task: a rejoinder to van der Lubbe and Abrahamse (2010).
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Feb;136(2):265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
3
The Simon effect in cognitive electrophysiology: A short review.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Feb;136(2):203-11. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
4
Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Feb;63(2):320-40. doi: 10.1080/17470210902925270. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
5
6
S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.
J Exp Psychol. 1953 Sep;46(3):199-210. doi: 10.1037/h0062827.
7
An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 May;13(3):427-40. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00054-x.
8
The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr;26(2):648-70. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.2.648.
10
Perception-action coupling and S-R compatibility.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1995 Nov;90(1-3):287-99. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00036-t.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验