Princeton Writing Program, 2 New South, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Feb;41:100740. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100740. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
Inhibitory control is a core executive function (EF) skill, thought to involve cognitive 'interference suppression' and motor 'response inhibition' sub-processes. A few studies have shown that early bilingualism shapes interference suppression but not response inhibition skills, however current behavioral measures do not fully allow us to disentangle these subcomponents. Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) are centroparietal event-related potentials (ERPs) that track motor response-preparations between stimulus-presentation and behavioral responses. We examine LRPs elicited during successful inhibitory control on a nonverbal Stroop task, in 6-8 year-old bilingual (n = 44) and monolingual (n = 48) children from comparable socio-economic backgrounds. Relative to monolinguals, bilinguals showed longer and stronger incorrect-response preparations, and a more mature pattern of correct-response preparation (shorter peak-latencies), underlying correct responses on Stroop-interference trials. Neural markers of response-inhibition were comparable between groups and no behavioral differences were found between-groups on the Stroop task. Results suggest group differences in underlying mechanisms of centroparietal motor-response preparation mechanisms in this age group, contrary to what has been shown using behavioral tasks previously. We discuss neural results in the context of speed-accuracy trade-offs. This is the first study to examine neural markers of motor-responses in bilingual children.
抑制控制是一种核心执行功能(EF)技能,被认为涉及认知“干扰抑制”和运动“反应抑制”子过程。一些研究表明,早期的双语环境会影响干扰抑制但不影响反应抑制技能,然而目前的行为测量方法并不能完全区分这些子成分。侧化准备电位(LRPs)是一种中央顶叶事件相关电位(ERPs),用于跟踪刺激呈现和行为反应之间的运动反应准备。我们在具有相似社会经济背景的 6-8 岁双语(n=44)和单语(n=48)儿童中,检查了在非言语 Stroop 任务中成功进行抑制控制时诱发的 LRPs。与单语儿童相比,双语儿童的错误反应准备时间更长、强度更大,正确反应准备(峰值潜伏期更短)的模式更加成熟,这是 Stroop 干扰试验中正确反应的基础。两组之间的反应抑制神经标记物相似,在 Stroop 任务中两组之间没有发现行为差异。结果表明,在这个年龄段,双语儿童的中央顶叶运动反应准备机制的潜在机制存在群体差异,这与之前使用行为任务得出的结果相反。我们在速度-准确性权衡的背景下讨论神经结果。这是第一项研究双语儿童运动反应的神经标记物的研究。