Yin Fei, Sun Zhenzhong, Yin Qudong, Liu Jun, Gu Sanjun, Zhang Shaodong
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;28(2):227-32.
To compare the effective of short-segment pedicle instrumentation with bone grafting and pedicle screw implanting in injured vertebra and cross segment pedicle instrumentation with bone grafting in injured vertebra for treating thoracolumbar fractures.
A prospective randomized controlled study was performed in 40 patients with thoracolumbar fracture who were in accordance with the inclusive criteria between June 2010 and June 2012. Of 40 patients, 20 received treatment with short-segment pedicle screw instrumentation with bone grafting and pedicle screw implanting in injured vertebra in group A, and 20 received treatment with cross segment pedicle instrumentation with bone grafting in injured vertebra in group B. There was no significant difference in gender, age, affected segment, disease duration, Frankel grade, Cobb angle, compression rate of anterior verterbral height, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between 2 groups before operation (P > 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, Cobb angle, compression rate of anterior vertebral height, loss of disc space height, Frankel grade, VAS and JOA scores were compared between 2 groups.
There was no significant difference in the operation time and blood loss between 2 groups (P > 0.05). Primary healing of incision was obtained in all patients, and no early complication of infection or lower limb vein thrombus occurred. Forty patients were followed up 12-16 months (mean, 14.8 months). No breaking or displacement of internal fixation was observed. The improvement of Frankel grading score was 0.52 +/- 0.72 in group A and 0.47 +/- 0.63 in group B, showing no significant difference (t = 0.188, P = 0.853) at 12 months after operation. The Cobb angle, compression rate of anterior verterbral height, and VAS score at 1 week and 12 months, and JOA score at 12 months were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in Cobb angle, disc space height, VAS score, and JOA score between 2 groups at each time point (P > 0.05), but the compression rate of anterior verterbral height in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P < 0.05). The loss of disc space height next to the internal fixation or the injured vertebra was observed in 2 groups at 12 months, but showing no significant difference (P > 0.05).
Compared with cross segment pedicle instrumentation, short-segment pedicle screw instrumentation with bone grafting and pedicle screw implanting in injured vertebra can recover and maintain the affected vertebra height in treating thoracolumbar fractures, but it could not effectively prevent degeneration of adjacent segments and the loss of kyphosis correction degree.
比较短节段椎弓根内固定联合伤椎植骨椎弓根螺钉植入与跨节段椎弓根内固定联合伤椎植骨治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效。
对2010年6月至2012年6月符合纳入标准的40例胸腰椎骨折患者进行前瞻性随机对照研究。40例患者中,20例在A组接受短节段椎弓根螺钉内固定联合伤椎植骨椎弓根螺钉植入治疗,20例在B组接受跨节段椎弓根内固定联合伤椎植骨治疗。两组患者术前在性别、年龄、受累节段、病程、Frankel分级、Cobb角、椎体前缘高度压缩率、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日本骨科学会(JOA)评分等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。比较两组患者的手术时间、出血量、Cobb角、椎体前缘高度压缩率、椎间隙高度丢失、Frankel分级、VAS及JOA评分。
两组患者手术时间和出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有患者切口均一期愈合,未发生早期感染或下肢静脉血栓等并发症。40例患者均获随访,随访时间12~16个月(平均14.8个月)。未观察到内固定断裂或移位。术后12个月A组Frankel分级评分改善值为0.52±0.72,B组为0.47±0.63,差异无统计学意义(t=0.188,P=0.853)。两组术后1周及12个月的Cobb角、椎体前缘高度压缩率、VAS评分及术后12个月的JOA评分与术前比较均有明显改善(P<0.05)。两组各时间点Cobb角、椎间隙高度、VAS评分及JOA评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但A组椎体前缘高度压缩率明显低于B组(P<0.05)。两组术后12个月均观察到内固定或伤椎相邻节段椎间隙高度丢失,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
与跨节段椎弓根内固定相比,短节段椎弓根螺钉内固定联合伤椎植骨椎弓根螺钉植入治疗胸腰椎骨折能恢复并维持伤椎高度,但不能有效防止相邻节段退变及后凸矫正度丢失。