Demey Dieter, Berrington Ann, Evandrou Maria, Falkingham Jane
ESRC Centre for Population Change, University of Southampton, Highfield, SO17 1BJ Southampton, United Kingdom.
ESRC Centre for Population Change, Centre for Research on Ageing, Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, SO17 1BJ Southampton, United Kingdom.
Adv Life Course Res. 2013 Sep;18(3):161-74. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
This paper adopts a life course approach to investigate the pathways into living alone in mid-life in Britain and how these vary by gender and socio-economic status. The rise in the proportion of people living alone over the past three decades has been well documented. However, much of the focus of the existing literature has been on either people living solo in young adulthood or in later life. Mid-life has received surprising little scholarly attention, despite the fact that living arrangements in mid-life are changing rapidly, and that household composition and socio-economic circumstances in the period immediately prior to retirement are strongly associated with living arrangements and associated sources of support in later life. This paper therefore aims to fill this gap. We begin with a review of previous research on living alone and present a conceptual framework of the pathways into living alone in mid-life. Data from the United Kingdom Household Longitudinal Survey (UKHLS) are used to analyse the partnership and parenthood histories and socio-economic characteristics of those currently living alone in mid-life. The findings indicate that the dissolution of a marriage with children is the dominant pathway into mid-life solo-living, but that there is also a substantial group of never partnered men living alone. These never partnered men are split between those with low and high socio-economic status. Distinguishing between different groups of individuals living alone in mid-life is important for policy as these groups of men and women will have different social and financial resources as they enter later life. Mid-life men living alone who have not had children, have no educational qualifications, are not economically active and who live in rented housing are likely to be most at risk of needing a social and economic 'safety net' in old age.
本文采用生命历程方法,研究英国中年独居的途径以及这些途径如何因性别和社会经济地位而异。过去三十年来独居人口比例的上升已有充分记录。然而,现有文献的大部分关注点要么是青年期独居的人,要么是老年期独居的人。尽管中年时期的居住安排正在迅速变化,而且退休前这段时期的家庭构成和社会经济状况与晚年的居住安排及相关支持来源密切相关,但中年却很少受到学术关注。因此,本文旨在填补这一空白。我们首先回顾以往关于独居的研究,并提出一个中年独居途径的概念框架。利用英国住户纵向调查(UKHLS)的数据,分析当前中年独居者的伴侣关系和为人父母的经历以及社会经济特征。研究结果表明,有子女婚姻的解体是中年独居的主要途径,但也有相当一部分从未有过伴侣的男性独居。这些从未有过伴侣的男性在社会经济地位低和高的人群中分布不均。区分中年独居的不同人群对政策制定很重要,因为这些男性和女性群体在进入晚年时将拥有不同的社会和经济资源。中年独居且没有子女、没有学历、没有经济活动且居住在出租房的男性,在老年时最有可能需要社会和经济“安全网”。