McGill University.
Personal Disord. 2014 Apr;5(2):234. doi: 10.1037/per0000010.
Replies to comments by Twenge, Miller, and Campbell (see record 2014-16207-001), Trull (see record 2014-16207-002), and Wright (see record 2014-16207-003) on the original article by Paris (see record 2012-18549-001) on the topic of narcissism and modernity. The current author would like to thank all three commentators for focusing on points in the original article that need clarification. Wright (2014) underlines the problem of precisely defining narcissism, arguing that research cannot progress until we agree on the meaning of the construct. Trull (2014) makes the useful point that cohort changes in narcissism do not translate into changes in the prevalence of NPD. Finally, Twenge, Miller, and Campbell (2014) are leaders in the empirical study of narcissism and NPD. The current author is pleased that they agree with some of his conclusions. However, they should not consider the case for dramatic increases in trait narcissism to be settled.
对 Paris（见记录 2012-18549-001）关于自恋和现代性主题的原始文章的评论的回复，来自于 Twenge、Miller 和 Campbell（见记录 2014-16207-001）、Trull（见记录 2014-16207-002）和 Wright（见记录 2014-16207-003）。当前作者感谢所有三位评论员都关注了原始文章中需要澄清的要点。Wright（2014）强调了准确定义自恋的问题，认为在我们就该结构的含义达成一致之前，研究无法取得进展。Trull（2014）提出了一个有用的观点，即自恋的队列变化并没有转化为 NPD 流行率的变化。最后，Twenge、Miller 和 Campbell（2014）是自恋和 NPD 实证研究的领导者。当前作者很高兴他们同意他的一些结论。然而，他们不应该认为特质自恋的显著增加的情况已经确定。
