Johnson Douglas B, Dahlman Kimberly H, Knol Jared, Gilbert Jill, Puzanov Igor, Means-Powell Julie, Balko Justin M, Lovly Christine M, Murphy Barbara A, Goff Laura W, Abramson Vandana G, Crispens Marta A, Mayer Ingrid A, Berlin Jordan D, Horn Leora, Keedy Vicki L, Reddy Nishitha M, Arteaga Carlos L, Sosman Jeffrey A, Pao William
Department of Medicine, Department of Cancer Biology, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Department of Medicine, Department of Cancer Biology, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Oncologist. 2014 Jun;19(6):616-22. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0011. Epub 2014 May 5.
Oncogenic genetic alterations "drive" neoplastic cell proliferation. Small molecule inhibitors and antibodies are being developed that target an increasing number of these altered gene products. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a powerful tool to identify tumor-specific genetic changes. To determine the clinical impact of extensive genetic analysis, we reviewed our experience using a targeted NGS platform (FoundationOne) in advanced cancer patients.
We retrospectively assessed demographics, NGS results, and therapies received for patients undergoing targeted NGS (exonic sequencing of 236 genes and selective intronic sequencing from 19 genes) between April 2012 and August 2013. Coprimary endpoints were the percentage of patients with targeted therapy options uncovered by mutational profiling and the percentage who received genotype-directed therapy.
Samples from 103 patients were tested, most frequently breast carcinoma (26%), head and neck cancers (23%), and melanoma (10%). Most patients (83%) were found to harbor potentially actionable genetic alterations, involving cell-cycle regulation (44%), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT (31%), and mitogen-activated protein kinase (19%) pathways. With median follow-up of 4.1 months, 21% received genotype-directed treatments, most in clinical trials (61%), leading to significant benefit in several cases. The most common reasons for not receiving genotype-directed therapy were selection of standard therapy (35%) and clinical deterioration (13%).
Mutational profiling using a targeted NGS panel identified potentially actionable alterations in a majority of advanced cancer patients. The assay identified additional therapeutic options and facilitated clinical trial enrollment. As time progresses, NGS results will be used to guide therapy in an increasing proportion of patients.
致癌基因改变“驱动”肿瘤细胞增殖。针对越来越多这些改变的基因产物,正在研发小分子抑制剂和抗体。下一代测序(NGS)是识别肿瘤特异性基因变化的有力工具。为了确定广泛基因分析的临床影响,我们回顾了在晚期癌症患者中使用靶向NGS平台(FoundationOne)的经验。
我们回顾性评估了2012年4月至2013年8月期间接受靶向NGS(对236个基因进行外显子测序和对19个基因进行选择性内含子测序)的患者的人口统计学特征、NGS结果和接受的治疗。共同主要终点是通过突变分析发现有靶向治疗选择的患者百分比以及接受基因型指导治疗的患者百分比。
对103例患者的样本进行了检测,最常见的是乳腺癌(26%)、头颈癌(23%)和黑色素瘤(10%)。大多数患者(83%)被发现存在潜在可操作的基因改变,涉及细胞周期调控(44%)、磷脂酰肌醇3-激酶-AKT(31%)和丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(19%)途径。中位随访4.1个月,21%的患者接受了基因型指导治疗,大多数是在临床试验中(61%),在一些病例中带来了显著益处。未接受基因型指导治疗的最常见原因是选择标准治疗(35%)和临床病情恶化(13%)。
使用靶向NGS panel进行突变分析在大多数晚期癌症患者中发现了潜在可操作的改变。该检测确定了额外的治疗选择并促进了临床试验入组。随着时间的推移,NGS结果将越来越多地用于指导患者的治疗。