Raza Syed J, Froghi Saied, Chowriappa Ashirwad, Ahmed Kamran, Field Erinn, Stegemann Andrew P, Rehman Shabnam, Sharif Mohamed, Shi Yi, Wilding Gregory E, Kesavadas Thenkurussi, Kaouk Jihad, Guru Khurshid A
Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; Department of Urology, MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Kings College, London, United Kingdom.
Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Kings College, London, United Kingdom.
J Surg Educ. 2014 May-Jun;71(3):316-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.006. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
Recent incorporation of simulation in surgical training necessitates developing validated platforms for training and assessment. A tool should fulfill the fundamental criteria of validation.
To report the ability of a simulation-based robotic training curriculum-Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery (FSRS)-to assess and distinguish between different performance levels of operator experience (construct validity).
This is a prospective multicenter observational study. Participants were classified as novice (0 robotic cases performed) and experts (>150 robotic cases performed). All participants were required to complete 4 key tasks in a previously validated FSRS curriculum: ball placement, coordinated tool control, fourth arm control, and needle handling and exchange. Using the metrics available in the simulator software, the performances of each group were compared to evaluate construct validation.
A convenience cohort of 61 surgeons participated. Novice group (n = 49) consisted of 41 fellows/residents/medical students and 8 trained open/laparoscopic surgeons, whereas expert group consisted of 12 surgeons. The novice group had no previous robotic console experience, whereas the expert group had >150 prior robotic cases experience. An overall significant difference was observed in favor of the expert group in 4 skill sets (p < 0.05). Time to complete all 4 tasks was significantly shorter in the expert group (p < 0.001). The expert group displayed significantly lesser tool collision (p = 0.002) and reduced tissue damage (p < 0.001). In performing most tasks, the expert group's camera (p < 0.001) and clutch usage (p < 0.001) was significantly greater when compared with the novice group.
The components of the FSRS curriculum showed construct validity. This validation would help in effectively implementing this curriculum for robot-assisted surgical training.
近期模拟技术被纳入外科培训,这就需要开发经过验证的培训和评估平台。一种工具应满足验证的基本标准。
报告基于模拟的机器人培训课程——机器人手术基本技能(FSRS)——评估并区分不同操作经验水平的能力(结构效度)。
这是一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。参与者被分为新手组(未进行过机器人手术病例)和专家组(进行过超过150例机器人手术病例)。所有参与者都被要求在先前验证过的FSRS课程中完成4项关键任务:球放置、协调工具控制、第四臂控制以及持针和换针操作。使用模拟器软件中的指标,比较每组的表现以评估结构效度。
61名外科医生组成了一个便利样本队列。新手组(n = 49)包括41名研究员/住院医师/医学生以及8名接受过开放/腹腔镜手术培训的外科医生,而专家组由12名外科医生组成。新手组之前没有机器人控制台操作经验,而专家组之前有超过150例机器人手术病例的经验。在4项技能组中观察到总体上专家组有显著优势(p < 0.05)。专家组完成所有4项任务的时间显著更短(p < 0.001)。专家组的工具碰撞显著更少(p = 0.002)且组织损伤减少(p < 0.001)。在执行大多数任务时,与新手组相比,专家组的摄像头使用(p < 0.001)和离合器使用(p < 0.001)显著更多。
FSRS课程的组成部分显示出结构效度。这种验证将有助于有效地将该课程应用于机器人辅助手术培训。