• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国范围内 Gleason 评分 3+3=6 前列腺癌的淋巴结转移率。

Nationwide prevalence of lymph node metastases in Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 prostate cancer.

机构信息

1Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford 2Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont 3Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Pathology. 2014 Jun;46(4):306-10. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000097.

DOI:10.1097/PAT.0000000000000097
PMID:24798166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5746183/
Abstract

Based on revisions of Gleason scoring in 2005, it has been reported that nodal metastases at radical prostatectomy in Gleason 3 + 3 = 6 (GS6) prostate cancer are extremely rare, and that GS6 cancers with nodal metastases are invariably upgraded upon review by academic urological pathologists. We analysed the prevalence and determinants of nodal metastases in a national sample of patients with GS6 cancer.We utilised the SEER database to identify patients diagnosed with GS6 prostate cancer during 2004-2010 who had radical prostatectomy and ≥1 lymph node(s) examined. We calculated the prevalence of nodal metastases and constructed a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with nodal metastases. Among 21,960 patients, the prevalence of nodal metastases was 0.48%. Older age, preoperative PSA >10  ng/mL, and advanced stage were positively associated with nodal metastases. Lymph node metastases in GS6 cancer are more prevalent in a nationwide population compared to academic centres. Revised guidelines for Gleason scoring have made GS6 cancer a more homogeneously indolent disease, which may be relevant in the era of active surveillance. We submit that lymph node metastases in GS6 cancer be used as a proxy for adherence to the 2005 ISUP consensus on Gleason grading.

摘要

基于 2005 年 Gleason 评分的修订,有报道称在根治性前列腺切除术中,Gleason 评分 3+3=6(GS6)前列腺癌的淋巴结转移极为罕见,并且在学术泌尿科病理学家审查时,GS6 癌症的淋巴结转移总是被升级。我们分析了全国 GS6 癌症患者样本中淋巴结转移的患病率和决定因素。我们利用 SEER 数据库确定了 2004 年至 2010 年间诊断为 GS6 前列腺癌且接受根治性前列腺切除术且至少检查了 1 个淋巴结的患者。我们计算了淋巴结转移的患病率,并构建了多变量逻辑回归模型来确定与淋巴结转移相关的因素。在 21960 名患者中,淋巴结转移的患病率为 0.48%。年龄较大、术前 PSA>10ng/mL 和晚期疾病与淋巴结转移呈正相关。与学术中心相比,全国范围内 GS6 癌症的淋巴结转移更为普遍。Gleason 评分修订指南使 GS6 癌症成为一种更同质的惰性疾病,这在主动监测时代可能具有相关性。我们提出,GS6 癌症中的淋巴结转移可用作遵守 2005 年 ISUP 关于 Gleason 分级共识的替代指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e3/5746183/2ab2d7a15451/nihms928963f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e3/5746183/2ab2d7a15451/nihms928963f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e3/5746183/2ab2d7a15451/nihms928963f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Nationwide prevalence of lymph node metastases in Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 prostate cancer.全国范围内 Gleason 评分 3+3=6 前列腺癌的淋巴结转移率。
Pathology. 2014 Jun;46(4):306-10. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000097.
2
Risk of lymph node metastases in pathological gleason score≤6 prostate adenocarcinoma: Analysis of institutional and population-based databases.病理Gleason评分≤6的前列腺腺癌发生淋巴结转移的风险:基于机构和人群数据库的分析
Urol Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):31.e1-31.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.对于当代 Gleason 评分 6 级前列腺癌,前列腺外延伸极为罕见。
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):455-460. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.028. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
4
Preoperative multiparametric MRI of the prostate for the prediction of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection.前列腺癌患者行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺术前多参数 MRI 预测淋巴结转移。
Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):1969-1976. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5229-6. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.基于活检 Gleason 评分和 PSA 的早期前列腺癌患者的病理性升级或局部进展风险:现代患者的基于人群研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.051. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Blinded review of archival radical prostatectomy specimens supports that contemporary Gleason score 6 prostate cancer lacks metastatic potential.对存档的根治性前列腺切除术标本进行盲法评估支持以下观点:当代 Gleason 评分 6 级的前列腺癌缺乏转移潜能。
Prostate. 2017 Jul;77(10):1076-1081. doi: 10.1002/pros.23364. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
Clinical significance of prospectively assigned Gleason tertiary pattern 4 in contemporary Gleason score 3+3=6 prostate cancer.当代 Gleason 评分 3+3=6 的前列腺癌中前瞻性分配的 Gleason 三级 4 型模式的临床意义
Prostate. 2016 Jun;76(8):715-21. doi: 10.1002/pros.23166. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
The staging pelvic lymphadenectomy: implications as an adjunctive procedure for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Br J Urol. 1997 Aug;80(2):243-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00233.x.
9
Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.前列腺穿刺活检中格里森评分 3+4=7(最低格里森评分 4 成分极少)的前列腺癌与根治性前列腺切除术后标本中低危肿瘤相关。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Aug;38(8):1096-101. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000235.
10
Histopathological characteristics of lymph node metastases predict cancer-specific survival in node-positive prostate cancer.淋巴结转移的组织病理学特征可预测淋巴结阳性前列腺癌的癌症特异性生存率。
BJU Int. 2008 Dec;102(11):1589-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07904.x. Epub 2008 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracellular vesicles in prostate cancer: a narrative review.前列腺癌中的细胞外囊泡:一项叙述性综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Apr;10(4):1890-1907. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1210.
2
Diagnostic performance of a nomogram incorporating cribriform morphology for the prediction of adverse pathology in prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.用于预测前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术中不良病理的包含筛状形态的列线图的诊断性能。
Oncol Lett. 2020 Sep;20(3):2797-2805. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11861. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
3
Cancer overdiagnosis: a biological challenge and clinical dilemma.

本文引用的文献

1
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: an opportunity for improvement.癌症中的过度诊断和过度治疗:改进的契机。
JAMA. 2013 Aug 28;310(8):797-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.108415.
2
NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Role of active surveillance in the management of men with localized prostate cancer.美国国立卫生研究院科学现状会议声明:主动监测在局限性前列腺癌男性患者管理中的作用
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2011;28(1):1-27.
3
The impact of anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy on cancer control: the 30-year anniversary.
癌症过度诊断:生物学挑战与临床困境
Nat Rev Cancer. 2019 Jun;19(6):349-358. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0142-8.
4
Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Tumor Upgrading in the Surgical Specimen: Analysis of Clinical Factors Predicting Tumor Upgrading in a Contemporary Series of Patients Who were Evaluated According to the Modified Gleason Score Grading System.手术标本中的低风险前列腺癌与肿瘤升级:根据改良Gleason评分分级系统评估的当代患者系列中预测肿瘤升级的临床因素分析
Curr Urol. 2017 Aug;10(3):118-125. doi: 10.1159/000447164. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
5
Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?真正的 Gleason 模式 3 是否值得使用癌症描述符?
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Sep;13(9):541-8. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.141. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
6
Hemiablative Focal Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy: A Phase II Trial Protocol.半消融性局部低剂量率近距离放射治疗:一项II期试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(2):e98. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5433.
7
Update on histopathological evaluation of lymphadenectomy specimens from prostate cancer patients.前列腺癌患者淋巴结切除标本的组织病理学评估最新进展
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):517-526. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1752-8. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
8
Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: Guideline recommendations.局限性前列腺癌管理的主动监测:指南推荐
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 May-Jun;9(5-6):171-8. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2806.
9
Should Gleason 6 be labeled as cancer?Gleason 6级应被标记为癌症吗?
Curr Opin Urol. 2015 May;25(3):238-45. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000165.
解剖性根治性前列腺切除术对癌症控制的影响:30 年纪念。
J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6):2219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.028. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
4
Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes?前列腺 Gleason 评分(GS)≤6 的腺癌是否有转移到淋巴结的潜力?
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Sep;36(9):1346-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182556dcd.
5
The potential impact of reproducibility of Gleason grading in men with early stage prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: a multi-institutional study.早期前列腺癌主动监测患者 Gleason 分级可重复性的潜在影响:一项多机构研究。
J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):465-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.115. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
6
Long-term outcome in patients with a Gleason score ≤ 6 prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术治疗 Gleason 评分≤6 的前列腺癌患者的长期结局。
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(5):660-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09978.x. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
7
The value of mandatory second opinion pathology review of prostate needle biopsy interpretation before radical prostatectomy.在根治性前列腺切除术之前,对前列腺针活检解读进行强制性二次病理审查的价值。
J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.021. Epub 2010 May 15.
8
Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌大样本主动监测队列长期随访的临床结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):126-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
9
Reliability of small amounts of cancer in prostate biopsies to reveal pathologic grade.前列腺活检中少量癌灶用于揭示病理分级的可靠性
Urology. 2006 Jun;67(6):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.031.
10
Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon.前列腺癌与威尔·罗杰斯现象
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Sep 7;97(17):1248-53. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji248.