Song Shuang, Levi Dennis M, Pelli Denis G
Vision Science, School of Optometry, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
J Vis. 2014 May 5;14(5):3. doi: 10.1167/14.5.3.
Here, we systematically explore the size and spacing requirements for identifying a letter among other letters. We measure acuity for flanked and unflanked letters, centrally and peripherally, in normals and amblyopes. We find that acuity, overlap masking, and crowding each demand a minimum size or spacing for readable text. Just measuring flanked and unflanked acuity is enough for our proposed model to predict the observer's threshold size and spacing for letters at any eccentricity. We also find that amblyopia in adults retains the character of the childhood condition that caused it. Amblyopia is a developmental neural deficit that can occur as a result of either strabismus or anisometropia in childhood. Peripheral viewing during childhood due to strabismus results in amblyopia that is crowding limited, like peripheral vision. Optical blur of one eye during childhood due to anisometropia without strabismus results in amblyopia that is acuity limited, like blurred vision. Furthermore, we find that the spacing:acuity ratio of flanked and unflanked acuity can distinguish strabismic amblyopia from purely anisometropic amblyopia in nearly perfect agreement with lack of stereopsis. A scatter diagram of threshold spacing versus acuity, one point per patient, for several diagnostic groups, reveals the diagnostic power of flanked acuity testing. These results and two demonstrations indicate that the sensitivity of visual screening tests can be improved by using flankers that are more tightly spaced and letter like. Finally, in concert with Strappini, Pelli, Di Pace, and Martelli (submitted), we jointly report a double dissociation between acuity and crowding. Two clinical conditions-anisometropic amblyopia and apperceptive agnosia-each selectively impair either acuity A or the spacing:acuity ratio S/A, not both. Furthermore, when we specifically estimate crowding, we find a double dissociation between acuity and crowding. Models of human object recognition will need to accommodate this newly discovered independence of acuity and crowding.
在此,我们系统地探究了在其他字母中识别一个字母所需的大小和间距要求。我们测量了正常人和弱视患者在中央和周边视野中,侧翼字母和非侧翼字母的视敏度。我们发现,视敏度、重叠掩蔽和拥挤现象对于可读文本都有最小尺寸或间距的要求。仅测量侧翼和非侧翼视敏度,我们所提出的模型就足以预测观察者在任何偏心度下字母的阈值大小和间距。我们还发现,成人弱视保留了导致其发病的儿童时期病症的特征。弱视是一种发育性神经缺陷,可能由儿童时期的斜视或屈光参差引起。儿童时期因斜视导致的周边视野注视会引发拥挤受限型弱视,类似于周边视觉。儿童时期因无斜视的屈光参差导致一只眼睛的光学模糊会引发视敏度受限型弱视,类似于视力模糊。此外,我们发现,侧翼和非侧翼视敏度的间距与视敏度之比能够区分斜视性弱视和单纯屈光参差性弱视,其结果与缺乏立体视觉的情况几乎完全一致。几个诊断组的阈值间距与视敏度散点图(每位患者一个点)显示了侧翼视敏度测试的诊断能力。这些结果及两项演示表明,使用间距更紧密且类似字母的侧翼刺激可以提高视觉筛查测试的灵敏度。最后,与斯特拉皮尼、佩利、迪·佩斯和马尔泰利(已提交)共同研究,我们联合报告了视敏度和拥挤现象之间的双重分离。两种临床病症——屈光参差性弱视和统觉失认症——分别选择性地损害视敏度A或间距与视敏度之比S/A,而非两者皆损。此外,当我们专门估计拥挤现象时,发现视敏度和拥挤现象之间存在双重分离。人类物体识别模型将需要适应这种新发现的视敏度和拥挤现象的独立性。