Koo Hoonmo L, Van John N, Zhao Meina, Ye Xunyan, Revell Paula A, Jiang Zhi-Dong, Grimes Carolyn Z, Koo Diana C, Lasco Todd, Kozinetz Claudia A, Garey Kevin W, DuPont Herbert L
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;35(6):667-73. doi: 10.1086/676433. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
To evaluate the accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) detection, after hospital CDAD rates significantly increased following real-time PCR initiation for CDAD diagnosis.
Hospital-wide surveillance study following examination of CDAD incidence density rates by interrupted time series design.
Large university-based hospital.
Hospitalized adult patients.
CDAD rates were compared before and after real-time PCR implementation in a university hospital and in the absence of physician and infection control practice changes. After real-time PCR introduction, all hospitalized adult patients were screened for C. difficile by testing a fecal specimen by real-time PCR, toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and toxigenic culture.
CDAD hospital rates significantly increased after changing from cell culture cytotoxicity assay to a real-time PCR assay. One hundred ninety-nine hospitalized subjects were enrolled, and 101 fecal specimens were collected. C. difficile was detected in 18 subjects (18%), including 5 subjects (28%) with either definite or probable CDAD and 13 patients (72%) with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization.
The majority of healthcare-associated diarrhea is not attributable to CDAD, and the prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization exceeds CDAD rates in healthcare facilities. PCR detection of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization among patients with non-CDAD diarrhea may be contributing to rising CDAD rates and a significant number of CDAD false positives. PCR may be useful for CDAD screening, but further study is needed to guide interpretation of PCR detection of C. difficile and the value of confirmatory tests. A gold standard CDAD diagnostic assay is needed.
在艰难梭菌相关性疾病(CDAD)诊断采用实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)后医院CDAD发生率显著增加的情况下,评估实时PCR检测CDAD的准确性。
采用中断时间序列设计对CDAD发病率密度率进行检查后的全院范围监测研究。
大型大学附属医院。
住院成年患者。
在一所大学医院实施实时PCR前后,且在医生和感染控制措施未改变的情况下,比较CDAD发生率。引入实时PCR后,通过实时PCR、毒素酶联免疫吸附测定和产毒培养检测粪便标本,对所有住院成年患者进行艰难梭菌筛查。
从细胞培养细胞毒性测定改为实时PCR测定后,医院CDAD发生率显著增加。纳入199名住院受试者,收集了101份粪便标本。在18名受试者(18%)中检测到艰难梭菌,其中包括5名(28%)确诊或可能患有CDAD的受试者和13名(72%)无症状艰难梭菌定植患者。
大多数医疗保健相关腹泻并非由CDAD引起,在医疗机构中无症状艰难梭菌定植的患病率超过CDAD发生率。对非CDAD腹泻患者进行无症状艰难梭菌定植的PCR检测可能导致CDAD发生率上升和大量CDAD假阳性。PCR可能有助于CDAD筛查,但需要进一步研究以指导对艰难梭菌PCR检测结果的解读以及确证试验的价值。需要一种CDAD诊断的金标准检测方法。