Monday Lea, Tillotson Glenn, Chopra Teena
Division of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
GlennTillotson PhD, FIDSA, GSTMicro, Henrico, VA, USA.
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Feb 15;17:623-639. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S419243. eCollection 2024.
infection (CDI) remains a significant contributor to healthcare costs and morbidity due to high rates of recurrence. Currently, available antibiotic treatment strategies further disrupt the fecal microbiome and do not address the alterations in commensal flora (dysbiosis) that set the stage for CDI. Advances in microbiome-based research have resulted in the development of new agents, classified as live biotherapeutic products (LBPs), for preventing recurrent CDI (rCDI) by restoring eubiosis. Prior to the LBPs, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was available for this purpose; however, lack of large-scale availability and safety concerns have remained barriers to its widespread use. The LBPs are an exciting development, but questions remain. Some are derived directly from human stool while other developmental products contain a defined microbial consortium manufactured ex vivo, and they may be composed of either living bacteria or their spores, making it difficult to compare members of this heterogenous drug class to one another. None have been studied head-to head or against FMT in preventing rCDI. As a class, they have considerable variability in their biologic composition, biopharmaceutic science, route of administration, stages of development, and clinical trial data. This review will start by explaining the role of dysbiosis in CDI, then give the details of the biopharmaceutical components for the LBPs which are approved or in development including how they differ from FMT and from one another. We then discuss the clinical trials of the LBPs currently approved for rCDI and end with the future clinical directions of LBPs beyond .
由于复发率高,艰难梭菌感染(CDI)仍然是医疗成本和发病率的重要促成因素。目前,现有的抗生素治疗策略会进一步破坏粪便微生物群,且无法解决共生菌群的改变(生态失调)问题,而正是这种改变为CDI奠定了基础。基于微生物组的研究进展已促成了新制剂的开发,这些制剂被归类为活生物治疗产品(LBPs),旨在通过恢复正常共生状态来预防复发性CDI(rCDI)。在LBPs出现之前,粪便微生物群移植(FMT)可用于此目的;然而,缺乏大规模可及性和安全性问题一直是其广泛应用的障碍。LBPs是一项令人兴奋的进展,但问题仍然存在。有些直接来源于人类粪便,而其他正在开发的产品则包含在体外制造的特定微生物组合,它们可能由活细菌或其孢子组成,这使得难以将这一异类药物类别中的成员相互比较。在预防rCDI方面,尚未对它们进行直接比较研究,也未与FMT进行对比研究。作为一个类别,它们在生物学组成、生物制药科学、给药途径、开发阶段和临床试验数据方面存在很大差异。本综述将首先解释生态失调在CDI中的作用,然后详细介绍已获批准或正在开发的LBPs生物制药成分,包括它们与FMT的区别以及相互之间的差异。接着,我们将讨论目前已获批准用于rCDI的LBPs的临床试验,并以LBPs未来的临床发展方向作为结尾。