Altuntas Yunus E, Unel Sacide, Gezen Fazlı C, Aksakal Nihat, Civil Osman, Vural Selahattin, Ozates Mustafa, Oncel Mustafa
General Surgery Department of Kartal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey ; Altayçeşme Mah. Varna Sok. No:15/B D:2 Menekşe Sit., Maltepe, Istanbul, 34843 Turkey.
Radiology Department of Kartal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Indian J Surg. 2014 Feb;76(1):61-5. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0554-0. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
Intraoperative ultrasound has been using to achieve a proper resection strategy in patients undergoing a hepatic colorectal metastasectomy. This study aims to describe and reveal the place of stereotactic metastasectomy in nonpalpable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). A chart review was initiated for all patients underwent resection for CLM between 2006 and 2011. The data concerning perioperative data and intraoperative strategy were abstracted. Among the 58 patients, who underwent a resection for CLM, 4 (6.9 %) (all men, median age 65.5, range 49-72, years) necessitated a stereotactic metastasectomy. Preoperative evaluations showed 1 (n = 1), 2 (n = 2), or 3 (n = 1) lesions, and intraoperative ultrasound (IUS) found an additional lesion in a case. Stereotactic marking was performed for nonpalpable lesions located in segments IVA, II, and VI and at the junction of segments V and VI. The margins were negative for all lesions both resected with conventional and stereotactic techniques. The examinations of the stereotactic resection materials revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma (patients n = 2), focal nodular hyperplasia (n = 1), and abnormal benign liver histology probably induced by chemotherapy (n = 1). The median (range) operation and hospitalization periods were 217.5 (150-310) minutes and 5.5 (2-9) days. No complications were observed except biliary fistula in a case, which spontaneously disappeared within 2 weeks. A patient died due to systemic disease including hepatic metastases 33 months after the liver surgery. Stereotactic metastasectomy may be feasible for the removal of nonpalpable CLM. Further evaluations are necessitated to understand the accurate place of this novel technique.
术中超声已被用于为接受肝结直肠癌转移灶切除术的患者制定合适的切除策略。本研究旨在描述和揭示立体定向转移灶切除术在不可触及的结直肠癌肝转移(CLM)中的地位。对2006年至2011年间所有接受CLM切除术的患者进行了病历回顾。提取了围手术期数据和术中策略相关的数据。在58例行CLM切除术的患者中,4例(6.9%)(均为男性,中位年龄65.5岁,范围49 - 72岁)需要进行立体定向转移灶切除术。术前评估显示有1例(n = 1)、2例(n = 2)或3例(n = 1)病灶,术中超声(IUS)在1例中发现了额外的病灶。对位于IVA段、II段和VI段以及V段和VI段交界处的不可触及病灶进行了立体定向标记。所有采用传统技术和立体定向技术切除的病灶切缘均为阴性。对立体定向切除标本的检查显示为转移性腺癌(2例患者)、局灶性结节性增生(1例)以及可能由化疗引起的异常良性肝脏组织学改变(1例)。中位(范围)手术时间和住院时间分别为217.5(150 - 310)分钟和5.5(2 - 9)天。除1例出现胆瘘且在2周内自行消失外,未观察到其他并发症。1例患者在肝脏手术后33个月因包括肝转移在内的全身性疾病死亡。立体定向转移灶切除术对于切除不可触及的CLM可能是可行的。需要进一步评估以了解这项新技术的确切地位。