Animal Husbandry and Animal Breeding, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Animal Husbandry and Animal Breeding, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
J Therm Biol. 2014 May;42:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
Body temperature (Tb) represents one of the key parameters in ecophysiological studies with focus on energy saving strategies. In this study we therefore comparatively evaluated the usefulness of two types of temperature-sensitive passive transponders (LifeChips and IPTT-300) and one data logger (iButton, DS1922L) mounted onto a collar to measure Tb in the field. First we tested the accuracy of all three devices in a water bath with water temperature ranging from 0 to 40°C. Second, we evaluated the usefulness of the LifeChips and the modified iButtons for measuring Tb of small heterothermic mammals under field conditions. For this work we subcutaneously implanted 14 male edible dormice (Glis glis) with transponders, and equipped another 14 males with data loggers to simultaneously record Tb and oxygen consumption with a portable oxygen analyzer (Oxbox). In one individual we recorded Tb with both devices and analyzed recorded Tb patterns. LifeChips are able to measure temperature within the smallest range from 25 to 40°C with an accuracy of 0.07±0.12°C. IPTT-300 transponders measured temperature between 10 and 40°C, but accuracy decreased considerably at values below 30°C, with maximal deviations of nearly 7°C. An individual calibration of each transponder is therefore needed, before using it at low Tbs. The accuracy of the data logger was comparatively good (0.12±0.25°C) and stable over the whole temperature range tested (0-40°C). In all three devices, the repeatability of measurements was high. LifeChip transponders as well as modified iButtons measured Tb reliably under field conditions. Simultaneous Tb-recordings in one edible dormouse with an implanted LifeChip and a collar-mounted iButton revealed that values of both measurements were closely correlated. Taken together, we conclude that implanted temperature-sensitive transponders represent an appropriate and largely non-invasive method to measure Tb also under field conditions.
体温(Tb)是能量节约策略生态生理学研究中的关键参数之一。因此,在本研究中,我们比较评估了三种类型的温度敏感被动传感器(LifeChips 和 IPTT-300)和一种数据记录器(iButton,DS1922L)在佩戴项圈在野外测量 Tb 的有效性。首先,我们在水温从 0 到 40°C 的水浴中测试了所有三种设备的准确性。其次,我们评估了 LifeChips 和改良 iButton 在野外条件下测量小型异温哺乳动物 Tb 的有效性。为此,我们将 14 只雄性食用睡鼠(Glis glis)皮下植入传感器,并为另外 14 只雄性配备数据记录器,以便使用便携式氧气分析仪(Oxbox)同时记录 Tb 和耗氧量。在一个个体中,我们用两种设备记录 Tb,并分析记录的 Tb 模式。LifeChips 能够在 25 到 40°C 的最小范围内测量温度,精度为 0.07±0.12°C。IPTT-300 传感器可以测量 10 到 40°C 的温度,但在 30°C 以下时精度会大大降低,最大偏差近 7°C。因此,在使用低 Tbs 之前,需要对每个传感器进行单独校准。数据记录器的精度相对较好(0.12±0.25°C),并且在测试的整个温度范围内都很稳定(0-40°C)。在所有三种设备中,测量的重复性都很高。LifeChip 传感器和改良的 iButton 在野外条件下都能可靠地测量 Tb。在一只植入 LifeChip 的食用睡鼠和一个佩戴在项圈上的 iButton 上同时进行 Tb 记录,显示两个测量值密切相关。综上所述,我们得出结论,植入式温度敏感传感器是一种合适的、在很大程度上非侵入性的方法,也可以在野外条件下测量 Tb。